Impersonating genius for gain

4 Comments

Colour Me Kubrick. Director: Brian Cook. Starring: John Malkovich, Richard E. Grant, Marisa Berenson and Jim Davidson. Running Time: 86 minutes.

Colour Me Kubrick is not quite a work of satirical genius,  but it is a very satisfying film. For all of its polish and craft, it lacks a certain something; a quality that could have raised it from being a good film, and up to the level of a great film.

Allan Conway, played by John Malkovich, is a conman in London. He seduces his gullible prey by impersonating famed (and now sadly departed) American auteur Stanley Kubrick. By this false pretense, and freely distributed promises of soon to be attained fame, Conway is able to drink, live and holiday for free. Based on a true life story, the film is set in the mid-nineties. It presages the growing mania for celebrity, and also demonstrates how easily people’s hopes and dreams can be used against them.

Director Brian Cook, formerly a first assistant director for Kubrick, sprinkles the film liberally with references to the dead director. Actors, locations, and especially the musical score all recall the him.

The film opens with two rough-looking, bowler hat-wearing men walking down a street. They are looking for the false Kubrick’s address. Cook’s use of  ‘The Thieving Magpie’ by Rossini heightens the comedy of the scene. They knock on the door of a fine looking English home, only to be confronted by an elderly gentleman who has never heard of Kubrick. The scene recalls Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange, but unlike in that film, the elderly man does not get hurt.

John Malkovich stands out from the rest of the cast as Conway, an openly gay middle aged man who neither resembles nor sounds like Stanley Kubrick. Malkovich is mischievous and adventurous in his playing of the role of a man whose chief goal is to keep himself happily intoxicated. The other performances are serviceable but not outstanding. The cast clearly enjoyed themselves, and their enjoyment is reflected on the screen in their energetic performances. 

The film comments pointedly on ‘modern society’ at times, without becoming sanctimonious. This man can go a long way by dropping names or taking on a fancy job title such as ‘film director’.  And in doing so, he becomes slightly ridiculous. By name-dropping, and false praise, Conway abuses his victims’ confidences – but do we really feel sorry for them? Generally his victims prefer not to press charges, for fear of public ridicule.

As long as one bears in mind this movie is about Conway, and his trading on the legend surrounding Kubrick, this is an enjoyable film. The humour is pithy and sharp, and Malkovich is excellent. Non-Kubrick fans may leave the cinema feeling vaguely unsatisfied.

 

 

submit a comment

Existing comments

I have read the first 3 lines, it's good.
gerard de robillard | 27 June 2006


I loved John Malkovich in In the Line of Fire, he is such a good actor. The film sounds as if it fails to deliver.
andrew johnson | 28 June 2006


great picture!!!!and sorry for your team.
esther das mainz | 29 June 2006


Brilliant description of this film. The author has a tight writing style which accurately and deliberately conveyed the film to us as potential viewers.
Kramers | 05 July 2006


Similar Articles

Keeping God's politics honest

  • Dave Hoskin
  • 26 June 2006

God's Politics is a book which, though flawed, does manage to straddle the divide between left and right, and in so doing, poses some interesting questions that neither side of politics can comfortably answer.

READ MORE

Animation rescues a limp plot

  • Donald Russell
  • 26 June 2006

Renaissance is an animated film with a conventional plot and off-the-rack characters, but the animation of the movie is a sumptuous feast. 

READ MORE

We've updated our privacy policy.

Click to review