Home » Vol 19 No 2 > Pell's common interest with unions

EDITORIAL

Pell's common interest with unions

Michael Mullins February 09, 2009

Cardinal George Pell told the Australian Workers' Union National Conference last week why quick action to avoid mass unemployment in the looming recession is so crucial to protect the wellbeing of so many Australians.

He said: 'Unemployment hits people hard; financially, first and foremost of course, but it also affects personal resilience, reduces participation, and increases isolation in the community.'

Cardinal Pell linked this with social capital, which he defined as the 'shared understandings and values [that] help us put our own issues aside and focus on the greater good'.

He quoted the Australian Bureau of Statistics' 2006 Aspects of Social Capital report, which argues that people who are unemployed are likely to have less regular contact with friends or family living elsewhere and feel less able to ask them for small favours or help.

'They are less likely to take part in voluntary activities, and are also less likely to take part in social activities or attend cultural events.'

Cardinal Pell's comments about social capital have direct implications on current debate surrounding the Federal Government's $42 billion economic stimulus package.

The measures are weighted in favour of funds for social infrastructure, which would create immediate employment. The bulk of the money would be spent on schools, training centres, community housing, and ceiling insulation.

The argument against the package is focused on the need for careful scrutiny before the Parliament commits so such a large expenditure. But some business commentators are concerned that only 12.5 per cent of the amount is allocated to economic infrastructure.

ABN Amro Morgans analyst Michael Knox suggested in last Thursday's Australian Financial Review that investing in economic infrastructure 'has more bang for the buck than social infrastructure precisely because private sector businesses come in and multiply the original effect on the economy of the money spent by government'.

More spending on economic infrastructure would be expected to encourage business investment in projects likely to create employment in the medium and long term (this was also the promise of Workchoices). But in the short term, many Australian workers and their families would be struck down by unemployment, and this would come at great social cost.

---

Michael Mullins is editor of Eureka Street.

 

 

 

---

SUBMITTED COMMENTS

 

Phil Smith08-Feb-2009

Hear hear!

---

Nathalie09-Feb-2009

Hm! I don't know, Michael! I just don't believe a word Pell says. And I'm old enough to say: watch him, he can be a snake in the grass!

---

Jan van Egmond12-Apr-2009

Religous input always muddies clear thinking. Ever since the first synod accepted our Sun as the Christian God. Not to be to harsh on believers we are all amde out of sun particles that is why we die because the Sun their God is a ball of gas.

Previous Articles by this Author

EDITORIAL

Why we're slow to help Pakistan  

The Australian public is being delivered a profoundly misleading subliminal message that, because the Taliban are active in the region, they are tied up in providing relief for flood victims. We need to forget politics for a while and think about the part we can play in helping Pakistanis through their crisis.

EDITORIAL

Technophobe Tony's broadband back-step  

Broadband policy is the only major point of difference between Labor and the Coalition in the lead up to this Saturday's federal election. The minimalist approach mooted by the Coalition fails to appreciate fast broadband's nation-building potential.

EDITORIAL

Atheist 'Real Julia' courts Christian vote  

Gillard was photographed looking up to Cardinal George Pell with an admiring glance, and attended a fundraiser for expenses associated with October's Mary MacKillop canonisation in Rome. She offered $1.5 million in government money, but much more than that in flattery to Catholic electors.

EDITORIAL

Gillard's atheism belongs in the closet  

It could have been a mistake for Gillard to 'come out' as an atheist, as if giving witness to a firmly held religious belief. Abbott did better by declaring candidates' religious views a private matter that should not distract from voters' judgment of their policies.

EDITORIAL

Gillard bombing on moral leadership  

Julia Gillard appears to be in no mood to countenance the type of conviction politics that would be required to ratify the ban of cluster bombs. This is a far cry from the glory days of Kevin07 when Rudd said he would ratify Kyoto, then did exactly that.

EDITORIAL

Forget Keating-Hawke soapie, give Rudd a hug  

The public stoush between Paul Keating and Bob Hawke seems little more than soap opera for political junkies. Australian Jesuit Fr Frank Brennan longs for a political morality to guide politicians at times of political upheaval, such as Kevin Rudd's emotional departure from the Labor leadership.

EDITORIAL

MySuper's justified paternalism  

Channelling people into a default superannuation fund could be compared with the indignity of income management. But MySuper is geared to protect the human dignity of Australians in retirement against their own indifference, and also commercial exploitation.

EDITORIAL

Gillard mining deal betrays the common good  

Julia Gillard is expected to exercise moral authority because she was chosen by her party to work for the common good of the nation. Her agreement with major mining companies to take the sting out of the mining tax shows a poor start.

EDITORIAL

Australian Jesuit's gambling defence  

Everybody knows that problem gambling, just like binge drinking and illicit drugs, destroys lives. But should governments be aiming to eliminate gambling altogether? The Australian Jesuit Michael Kelly thinks not.

EDITORIAL

Multiculturalism steps aside for advertising on SBS  

SBS TV's world renowned Subtitling Unit is about to lose one third of its staff. It's perfectly valid for SBS to jettison its subtitlers if it determines that SBS is fundamentally no longer a multicultural broadcaster. It's up to SBS management to come clean on its current purpose.

Please fill out the following details (fields marked with a * are mandatory):
Send To Email Address*:
Send To Name *:
Sent By Email Address*:
Sent By Name *:
Text to include in email:
Captcha validation:	please enter the code above:

^ Page Top