: A publication of Jesuit Communications Australia
Podcasts (all articles) | Join us on Facebook   |  Follow us on Twitter
EUREKA STREET  
Search our site
You can search by topic, author, article title and keywords.
 
SUBSCRIBE TO DAILY ALERTS NEWSLETTER
EMAIL 

 

 

 

Advertisement

 

 

1pix
smaller font larger font print article Email this Article to a Friend Bookmark and Share
Home » Vol 19 No 20 > John Safran the holy fool
VIDEO

John Safran the holy fool

Peter Kirkwood October 23, 2009

John Safran, race relationsOn Wednesday ABC TV aired the first episode of John Safran's eight-part satirical series, Race Relations. It's timely and provocative, as race, and its portrayal and coverage on the media, have become hot-button issues.

The inauguration of Barack Obama early this year as the first black American President was much-heralded around the globe as a major stepping stone in overcoming race-based prejudice and hatred. But since the heady days of his election win and inauguration, there have been disrespectful and negative sentiments expressed about him in Washington street protests, and even in Congress.

Many observers, including former President Jimmy Carter, have denounced these as slurs based on race, slurs that would not have been aimed at a white president. But Obama himself, in what seems to be a move to defuse the situation, has played down any notion that criticism of him has been based on his race.

A race-based controversy erupted on Australian television, ignited by Hey Hey's clumsy blackfaced lampooning of the Jackson Five. And there was heated debate in the UK this week over the BBC's decision to include racist leader of the far-right British National Party, Nick Griffin, on the panel of current affairs show, Question Time.

The BNP's constitution states it is only open to white people, and one of its key platforms is to rid Britain of migrants, particularly Muslims. Griffin was one of a swag of ultra-right politicians recently elected to the European Parliament. Critics of the BBC argued that allowing him on Question Time would give legitimacy to his racist views.

So, with Race Relations, Safran enters highly vexed and contentious territory.

The premise is simple: Safran is Jewish, and there are family pressures to 'marry in' — to hitch up with a nice Jewish girl — but he is more attracted to Eurasian women. This leads him to ask, in matters of love, 'should you stick with your tribe, or escape your tribe?' — a worthwhile question in these fractious times.

He sets off on an international quest to examine 'cross-cultural, interracial and interfaith love'.

In the first episode (watch video here), a Eurasian ex-girlfriend who is a scientist tells him of an experiment in which female students were found to be more attracted to the male body odour of other races. So Safran steals the used knickers of female Jewish and Eurasian friends and devises his own experiment involving random panty sniffing.

This is followed by visits to Israeli and Palestinian sperm banks where he and his Palestinian sound recordist hoodwink the clinic supervisors and make a Palestinian sperm donation to the Israelis, and vice versa.

Is Race Relations part of the problem, or part of the solution? Certainly Safran's stunts are cringe-making, in your face, and potentially creepy. But they are put in the context of a cogent and pithy argument that has serious intent. I think he gets away with it.

And without wishing to put him on a pedestal, for those who have qualms about Safran from a religious point of view, it is well to keep in mind the tradition of the 'holy fool' — people who can see through cant, hypocrisy and pomposity, and, using cutting stories, actions or parables, tell uncomfortable home truths. Usually they are eccentric or slightly weird figures, often at loggerheads with authority and despised by the mainstream.

In Christianity the notion is famously described by Paul in 1 Corinthians 4:10 with its exhortation that Christians should be 'fools for the sake of Christ'. In Russian Orthodoxy it is expressed in the figure of the yurodivy, and Muslims have their malamiyya, usually translated as 'people of blame'.

Certainly Safran's sometime collaborator, parish priest of South Melbourne, Fr Bob Maguire (who appeared with him in the chat show Speaking in Tongues on SBS TV, and on Triple J radio) fits this mould. And it's safe to call Safran a holy fool of secular culture. So it's worth strapping on the seatbelt and going on the journey for the rest of Race Relations even if it's a bumpy, uncomfortable and confronting ride.


Peter KirkwoodPeter Kirkwood worked for 23 years in the Religion and Ethics Unit of ABC TV. He has a Master's degree from the Sydney College of Divinity.

 

Bookmark and Share

Enjoy this article? To email to a friend, click here.

 

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

 

Submitted feedback is moderated. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Name:
Email:
Comments:
Word Count: 0
(please limit to 200)
 


SUBMITTED COMMENTS

 

Martine Valentine23-Oct-2009

Yes, your article is spot on! Depite Episode 1 being a bit on the nose, Safran is a courageous religious comentator and goes where angels fear to tread... good on him.

PS sorry about all the cliches but I couldnt resist.


Nathan Socci24-Oct-2009

Sorry, somehow I never picked Safran as some sort of Prince Myshkin figure; just some cheeky kid who has always tried to get away with it - and some. I don't find anything holy in Safran's juvenile pranks.


Kimmo25-Oct-2009

Safran's 'juvenile pranks' as far as I can remember, are pretty much always motivated by a desire to illustrate usually sorely-missed points in the contemporary topical arena. And over the years, he's actually become quite good at it.

I pretty much consider him as a smartarse par excellence... lots of folks don't like smartarses, but being one myself, I have a lot of time for him. And I think those who enjoy a bit of intellectual exercise should be prepared to go out on a limb, where often tasty and exotic fruit can be found... The holy fool notion mentioned here pretty much gets at the same thing; the phrase 'Socratic license' springs to mind.

Thus I was immensely amused by Safran's antics on Wednesday; the puerile spectacle of Safran jerking off over a book cover featuring Obama, repeating 'Yes, we can!' to himself, was frankly heroic (I don't think that's going too far) given the context he'd established, and utterly hilarious. My face was sore from laughing.

I find Safran a good litmus test of whether I approve of another's values... if he turns you off you're probably missing the point. You'll miss a lot of points that way...


Previous Articles by this Author

VIDEO

Anwar invokes true meaning of sharia law  

The fire-bombings of Christian churches by militant Muslims in Malaysia highlight the need for interfaith dialogue. Malaysian Opposition Leader, Anwar Ibrahim says he was 'outraged by the tragic attacks on our Christian brothers and sisters'. Exclusive video interview


VIDEO

Best of 2009: John Safran the holy fool  

Safran's stunts — such as hoodwinking a Palestinian sperm bank into donating Palestinian sperm to the Israelis, and vice versa — are cringe-making. But they are in the context of a cogent and pithy argument that has serious intent. October 2009


VIDEO

Ethical solutions to the global moral crisis  

Hans Kung Peter Kirkwood Youtube interview'There will be no peace among religions without dialogue, and there will be no serious dialogue without common ethical standards.' In this video interview controversial theologian Hans Küng speaks exclusively to Eureka Street.


VIDEO

Death of fanaticism  

Religious bigotry, fanaticism, and associated violence are still very much with us. A central ethos of the Parliament of Religions is to honour, preserve and seek to understand the particularities of different faiths rather than try to make them all the same.


VIDEO

Doco asks what next for child migrants  

ABC1's The Long Journey Home is based on a book written by the best known alumnus of Fairbridge Farm, David Hill. After the heightened emotions surrounding Kevin Rudd’s apology to the Forgotten Australians, there is talk of forgiveness and compensation.


VIDEO

Jim Wallis next to Obama next to God  

Progressive Christian activist Jim Wallis is one of Barack Obama's key advisors on religious and ethical issues. He has been a key proponent of Obama's controversial health care reform legislation, which has raised the ire of some conservative Christians.


VIDEO

When Hitchens met Brennan  

Frank Brennan and Christopher Hitchens on Q+AChristopher Hitchens appeared on Q+A last week with Frank Brennan and others to debate questions of belief. Hitchens was a sharp debater, relentless in pointing out the flaws in fellow panelists' arguments. But Brennan was a worthy opponent.


VIDEO

Freemasons show the Church how to handle Dan Brown  

The Lost Symbol, by Dan BrownBrown's presentation of connivance and corruption in the upper echelons of the Catholic Church in The Da Vinci Code provoked a hostile response from the Church. The Freemasons have reacted more constructively to their portrayal in Brown's latest thriller.


VIDEO

Why Cardinal Pell was wrong about the Blake Prize  

Rapture by Angelica MesitiCardinal Pell called some of this year's Blake Prize finalists 'anti-religious' and reflecting 'confusion about what is religious or spiritual'. Religious experience is not confined within the walls of holy buildings. This year's Blake Prize winner attests to this.


VIDEO

Reasons for optimism in Israel and Palestine  

Karen Armstrong's The Compassion ProjectMembers of the Interreligious Coordinating Council in Israel are remarkably sanguine about the future. Within their lifetimes, they expect peace to reign after implementation of the two state solution.


More from this section

 

When Hitchens met Brennan
Peter Kirkwood 09-Oct-2009
Frank Brennan and Christopher Hitchens on Q+AChristopher Hitchens appeared on Q+A last week with Frank Brennan and others to debate questions of belief. Hitchens was a sharp debater, relentless in pointing out the flaws in fellow panelists' arguments. But Brennan was a worthy opponent.
Read more
15 comment(s) about this article.