A- A A+

Islamic values could control bank greed

Michael Mullins |  08 November 2010

Daily Telegraph Thurs 4 November 2010Shadow treasurer Joe Hockey stuck his neck out last month when he challenged treasurer Wayne Swan to stand up to the banks. He put a strong set of reform proposals on the table and spruiked them in the media.

Hockey pointed out that Reserve Bank minutes showed the banks had overstated increases in funding costs. He said the government should be protecting home buyers and small businesses from the banks’ predatory practices. At the time, Hockey was portrayed as a fool by the government and the banks, and even his own party leader Tony Abbott appeared to distance himself.

Since then, we’ve had the surprise interest rate rise on Melbourne Cup Day, and the Commonwealth Bank’s decision to take from its customers nearly double the amount of the Reserve Bank increase. Now Hockey is being rightfully lauded, and the tabloid press has launched a campaign against the banks’ corporate greed. 

On Friday, the Daily Telegraph was pointing the finger at banks when it reported survey findings that ‘almost 300,000 Australians say they are too poor to celebrate Christmas this year, while another 1.8 million will postpone it’. The paper urged its readers to get online with its blogger Tony Abbott to work out how to ‘get the banks under control’.

One way of getting the banks under control could be to study Islamic banking, which repudiates the principle of charging interest. Instead, under Sharia banking, the bank might enter into a partnership with the home buyer or small business owner, in which they share the profits. 

Last year the Vatican’s semi-official newspaper L’Osservatore Romano urged Catholics to take a sympathetic look at Islamic banking: ‘The ethical principles on which Islamic finance is based may bring banks closer to their clients and to the true spirit which should mark every financial service.’ 

Such thinking about banking shares common ground with the Grameen Bank, the microfinance entity that was founded in Bangladesh to make small loans to the poor that require self-discipline rather than collateral. 

Liberal Senator Cory Bernardi dismissed Islamic banking in comments he made last week, because ‘Sharia or Islamic law is incompatible with Australia's Western values’.

It could well be that he is right, and Islamic banking is indeed incompatible with Western values. But Western values that uphold a banking system that treats its customers with disdain – as the Commonwealth Bank did last week – need to be questioned. 

If Australians are not convinced that their banks are looking after them, a study of Sharia banking could lead us to adopt some of its values. This could prove to be as effective in eradicating corporate greed as changes in government regulation.

Michael MullinsMichael Mullins is editor of Eureka Street. He also teaches media ethics in the University of Sydney's Department of Media and Communications.



Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

Read the papal encyclicals listed below for the Catholic response to usury.



Trent 08 November 2010

Wow! It's 10.30 a.m. and only Trent has commented on Michael Mullins' thought provoking article.

Have we Eureka Street readers got such a vested interest in the banking system that we don't know how we should be making use of the present brouhaha to agitate for reform?

In my own case I think today is a wonderful time to re-examine in the light of numerous papal encyclicals the whole capitalist system and the democratic systems of varying probity that allow the wealthy "to gouge exorbitant profits" (to use a tabloid press expression) from the less well off.

I can't see any Catholics in the present federal parliament delivering a speech along the lines of John Paul II's Laborem exercens.
Maybe Eureka Street could give them a nudge.

Uncle Pat 08 November 2010

Bank bashing is easy. No bank can survive if it treats its customers with "disdain". Everyone wants services as cheaply as possible and no one likes price increases. Banking involves
borrowing money from someone and lending to another. There are risks on both sides of this
transaction. Banks shield their customers from this risk taking on the cost of failure as well
as that of providing computer and branch services. These costs need to be covered otherwise we end up with bank failures.

Borrowing costs are not simply determined by the Reserve bank but politicians and the media are happy to say they are. By all means defend bank customers and consider alternatives but don't trivialise the banking process.

Peter Anderson 08 November 2010

It is now 4.45 pm. Only three comments on Michael Mullins' article on one possible method of eradicating corporate greed from the banking system.

Looks like I was right. We Australians are so hooked into a system that is biassed heavily in favour of holders of bank shares, who are prepared to see their CEOs paid gobsmacking salaries and performance rewards, that we can't even suggest that maybe there should be some discussion on what is a reasonable cap on mortgage interest rates.

Uncle Pat 08 November 2010

This sounds very like the Old Testament laws of Moses . As Muslims are people of the book "(The Bible up to the New Testament)" This is quite likely the source. The Bible is a plan of how to live.

michael ansted 08 November 2010

Its the same thing but with more control... You get rent-to own what was 1 dollar is now 10 dollars...Its just a new form dictators... On what is and is not... and the one who hold the gold rules...

ZorroIsGod 09 November 2010

The only real peaceful trading system is the Native American seashell currency... Anyone could create the currency but it had to be made right... The martial used seashells not gold... gold only leads to more holes in the ground...greed to control... nobody starved and everyone had things they could do. Seashell games where used by people for people to build things... So ask your self what is usury... A basket maker would trade for seashells currency… a currency maker would trade for seashell… kids would walk the shoreline for them.. Their were no monopoly on currency making by banks…

ZorroIsGod 09 November 2010

So ask your self what is usury...

Is sharia banking not usury...

because it sure looks that way to me Native American... One who dictates Rent-To Own where price can be any demand... usury... One who uses money as a weapon against others for control...

ZorroIsGod 09 November 2010

It seems to me that the reason there are so few comments is that people know very little about the suggested alternative and perhaps not that they are uninterested. A deeper exploration of Sharia banking is necessary here. I like the premise that the values behind Sharia banking may offer ideas for Western society's current stand-off with the banks. However, does it equate to a real difference? I have heard that what Sharia loans lack in interest they make up for in fees. I guess that like many others, I should do some further reading..

Ashlea 09 November 2010

Initiatives are over due here in our country, India to make use of the benefit of Islamic Finance in our efforts to alleviate poverty , development and growth of our economy with special emphasis on rural development and agriculture.

Pareethu Bava Khan 09 November 2010

Similar articles

A plan to overcome poverty

Frank Quinlan | 11 November 2010

BlueprintCurrently, we have national plans for such things as defence, conservation and management of sharks, national broadband, combating pollution of the sea, and recovery of the south-eastern red-tailed black cockatoo. It's time we had a national plan to overcome poverty.

Tony Abbott's missing moral core

Neil Ormerod | 08 November 2010

Tony AbbottTony Abbott has been in public life for a long time. Most recently there has been his meteoric rise to leadership of the Liberal party and to a hair’s breadth from the prime ministership itself. Charming and disarming as he can be, there is something deeply disturbing in the way he carries out his public role.

John Howard shoe-thrower's moral miss-hit

Farid Farid | 29 October 2010

John Howard, ShoegateIf smelly shoes are the last objects of resistance then the occupation of Iraq will never end. The culturally co-optive nature of benevolent groups to take on causes and speak on behalf of those who allegedly cannot speak for themselves is disturbing.

Indigenous jobs another forsaken moral challenge

Michael Mullins | 01 November 2010

At the time of the Apology to the Stolen Generations in February 2008, former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd committed Labor to halving the gap in employment incomes within a decade. It is now looking like another great moral challenge that Labor has given up on.

The hard life and death of Tyler the Sorrowful

Moira Rayner | 27 October 2010

Tyler CassidyTyler Cassidy was a very upset, masked child on the day he was shot dead by police. They saw a boy who sounded like a man, playing 'dare' with a deadly weapon. Any parent will know that confronting an enraged teenage boy and advancing on him with threats is not likely to result in submission.