A- A A+

NSW and Victoria's 'tough on crime' confusion

Michael Mullins |  05 June 2011

'Tough on crime' by Chris Johnston'Get tough on crime' is a game of one-upmanship that state politicians play during election campaigns. In the lead up to this year's March election in NSW, Coalition leader Barry O'Farrell announced a 'blitz on crime', committing a Coalition government to the recruitment of 550 new police officers. This was in response to Labor's Kristina Keneally, whose promises included a $60 million law enforcement package.

It was a similar story in Victoria before November's state election, with Labor's John Brumby and Coalition leader Ted Bailleau both attempting to demonstrate toughness.

Now that the elections have been won and lost, both new governments are seeking to follow through on their election pledges. What is remarkable is the different approaches to what constitutes getting tough on crime. As mentioned, NSW believes police numbers is the answer. The Victorian Government, on the other hand, plans legislation to ensure more offenders are jailed.

To that end, the state's Attorney-General Robert Clark recently asked Victoria's Sentencing Advisory Council to look into minimum jail terms for teenagers convicted of violent crime. Meanwhile his NSW counterpart Greg Smith has vowed to reform the state's prison system by cutting what is Australia's largest prison population.

NSW is looking at Victoria's current relatively low rate of incarceration as a model. Victoria is seeking to adopt NSW attitudes from the era when, according to Smith, former premier Nathan Rees thought it was a 'badge of honour' to have 10,000 people in the jails.

Jesuit Social Services CEO Julie Edwards has spearheaded an innovative approach to protecting young offenders at risk. She has criticised Victoria's indiscriminate 'one size fits all' approach to sentencing and suggested the state's Attorney General should 'look north of the border as the new Liberal Government looks to reduce Australia's largest jail population by diverting offenders away from the prison system and reducing the rate of re-offending'.

Under the current Victorian law, the judiciary has the ability to hand out a harsh sentence if the situation requires. She argues that taking this flexibility away by fixing sentences in law is a backwards step. 'Judges, not politicians, should be setting sentences. When you are unwell you go and see a doctor… [not] your local politician.'

Edwards also points out that the idea that the electorate wants harsh treatment for offenders is a furphy. She cites the Tasmanian Jury Sentencing Study, which found that from a survey of jurors, 90 per cent agreed the judge's sentence was very or fairly appropriate, with more than half of those surveyed leaning towards greater leniency than the judge's sentence.

The NSW Government is not alone in its recognition of Victoria's enlightened approach to law and order, where helping to keep young people out of prison through early intervention has been the key to preventing crime and ensuring community safety.

Michael MullinsMichael Mullins is editor of Eureka Street. Follow him on Twitter.



Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

how is it that our anglo-christian nation is so determined to exercise punitive justice? where does it come from? Not the Gospel! where can australia find a heart for forgiveness, resurrection, hope, joy, new life for those without hope, those deemed hopeless by the politicians? Victoria now has more jails than ever; more indigenous youth in jail than ever... hopeless and depressing!

patricia bouma 05 June 2011

Last year I went to the funeral of a young man who had spent a lot of his youth in jail for drug related offences. Lots of public money had gone into keeping him 'safe'in jail but it seemed that the public purse dud not extend to helping him to live safely in the world outside. His problems had been exacerbated in jail. Jailing kids is no answer.

Lorna Hannan 06 June 2011

Having worked in a prison I agree with those who advocate a preventative approach to young offenders rather that the political heavy handed puitive approach. Young offenders become embittered against authority and consequently are more likely to become recidivist criminals . When I hear a politician utter those policy words "Tough on crime "I shudder.

David 06 June 2011

Patricia Bouma asks "where does punitive justice come from?" Perhaps from the very first story of the Old Testament where human kind was punished by God for all time because of the transgressions of Adam and Eve. Perhaps from the many references in the Gospels to eternal punishment and the Last Judgement.

john frawley 06 June 2011

Here in France 96 people are imprisoned for every 100,000 in the population. Australia is too high at the moment with 129. Top of the list is the USA at 756. Is the USA a safer place for its vast prisons network? No, the opposite is true

Alan Austin 06 June 2011

A great issue, Michael, and your piece was a great lead to the other articles. You expose the dangerous nonsense of politicians who pretend to think that imprisoning people solves just about everything.

Joe Castley 06 June 2011

Atheism in its modern forms sees salvation through science and "Law and Order". They think that by imposing the Law through more police and longer prison sentences the world will be made a better place,which in practise does not work. Churches have found it hard to persuade people through the Media that "Religion" is not some superstitous relic but a means of coming to terms with our mortality and failings leading to personal growth and fulfillment. Our successes come from our care of the unfortunate and pastoral ministry rather than preaching. In Victoria the work of chaplains in high Schools must be commended.

John Ozanne 07 June 2011

Similar articles

Border Protection's selective rescue

Tony Kevin | 10 May 2011

The 97 who vanishedLast November, a refugee boat was lost at sea en route to Christmas Island. It's presumed the 97 on board perished. Evidence suggests Australia's Border Protection Command selectively chooses to make little or no effort to find and help SIEV boats in possible distress.

WikiLeaks and the killing of bin Laden

Michael Mullins | 09 May 2011

One day we're told he was armed and used his wife as a human shield. The next, that he was unarmed, and that his unarmed wife rushed at a US attacker. WikiLeaks could be the only organisation we can expect to furnish us with reliable information on important events.

The murder of Osama Bin Laden

Moira Rayner | 04 May 2011

Osama Bin LadenBarack Obama has committed his people to a legal and ethical mistake which will be a continuing obstacle to the West's integrity in its pursuit of freedom, democracy, internationally recognised standards of justice and human rights, and lasting peace. 

Justifying Bin Laden's execution

Tony Kevin | 03 May 2011

Osama Bin LadenObama was admirably honest that Bin Laden had been killed after, not during, the firefight. Why wasn’t Bin Laden taken alive and returned from Pakistan to face US courts? Here is a case where the cutting of the Gordian knot through an on-the-spot execution may be justified as the lesser evil.

Refugee rage

Kerry Murphy | 28 April 2011

The Department of Immigration and Citizenship say they can't tell me anything. The Inspector General of Intelligence and Security tells me to contact DIAC. As an immigration lawyer I find this frustrating. How much worse must it be for asylum seekers kept in detention with no end in sight?