A- A A+

Fraser and Whitlam's fruitful rivalry

8 Comments
John Menadue |  12 December 2011

Gough WhitlamFred Daly, the irrepressible ALP Member for Grayndler whose first campaign slogan was 'Give us this day our Daly Fred', once said that today's political enemies may turn out to be friends tomorrow. Who would have thought in 1975 that that could be true of Gough Whitlam and Malcolm Fraser in 2011.

Whitlam has said he hasn't had a significant disagreement with Fraser for 30 years. There are outward signs that the bad blood of the past has been purged. At 95, Whitlam has already written (and probably pre-recorded, just in case) the introduction he will give when Fraser presents the Whitlam Oration on 6 June next year.

Bitter rivals though they were, Fraser and Whitlam in fact displayed unity on many issues. The fraught events of November 1975 notwithstanding, it is pertinent to consider how these political enemies contributed, not perhaps jointly, but separately to a much better society than we had in 1972.

Both were supporters of the US alliance , but sceptical of a lot of US policies. They were cautious about any US resolve to protect Australia when US relations with regional countries such as Indonesia were involved. Both were certain Australia's future depended less on North Atlantic protection and more on developing close relations within our region.

Following Whitlam's breakthrough in establishing diplomatic relations in 1972, Fraser's first overseas visit as prime minister was to China and then to Japan, where he continued the negotiation of a Treaty of Friendship that Whitlam had initiated.

Both sought to reduce sectarianism in Australian public life. Through state aid, for Catholic and other private schools, Whitlam turned the tide on sectarianism in Australia. Fraser was always critical of Billy Hughes for playing the sectarian card against Irish Catholics in Australia in WWI.

Both were concerned about Indigenous rights. The implementing bill on land rights was awaiting introduction in the Senate on the day of Whitlam's dismissal. In the first year of the Fraser Government, Parliament passed the Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act, 1976.

But the most effective unity ticket was race relations — ending the White Australia policy and cooperating in the settlement of Indochinese refugees.

Whitlam, Don Dunstan and others campaigned successfully to remove the White Australia plank from the ALP platform. The Whitlam Government removed racial discrimination from the statute book. But the new policy was never put to the test. The immigration intake under Whitlam was minimal — the lowest for 30 years and, excluding the Depression and war years, the lowest for 70 years.

In accepting 150,000 refugees from Indochina and with the 90,000 family reunions that followed, Malcolm Fraser broke the back of White Australia. We are now proud of what he and we did together — although it must be said that race relations and refugees remain difficult issues, with populists always ready and willing to exploit fear of the foreigner and the 'other'.

The Whitlam Government was cautious about taking evacuees after the fall of Saigon, limiting the intake chiefly to persons associated with Australia and to orphans. The Fraser Government faced a larger outflow from 1976 onwards, with many Vietnamese forced into harsh 're-education camps'.

Whitlam in Opposition and later Bill Hayden supported Fraser in his leadership on the Indochina intake; because of our commitment to troops in Vietnam we felt we had a particular moral obligation to act decently and generously. And we did. We are now proud of what we did at a difficult time.

The successful Indochina resettlement in Australia could not have occurred without the cooperation of regional countries. They provided temporary asylum for 1.4 million who fled Indochina.

Our dependence on those countries back then provides a lesson that we still have to learn today. Just imagine how Australia would have responded during the Fraser years if 50,000 to 100,000 boat people from Indochina had arrived directly on our coast — which they likely would have, if not for the intervention of countries such as Malaysia.

As Australians, we are still self-righteous in our attitudes to countries such as Malaysia who carry a much higher burden of asylum seekers than we do. Malaysia is making great progress in human rights protection, particularly when it comes to protecting vulnerable people fleeing Burma.

The betterment of society is always a work in progress. The fruitful rivalry between Whitlam and Fraser provides a salient contrast to the more destructive negativism that seems to be the hallmark of the Julia Gillard/Tony Abbott contest. They could learn much from these elder statesmen.


John MenadueJohn Menadue was private secretary to Gough Whitlam 1960–67, secretary to Prime Minister and Cabinet 197476 under Whitlam and Fraser, and secretary of the Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, 198083.


 



Comments

Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

Well and truly said, Mr Menadue. I think the problem is that it is Peta Credlin who is driving the Opposition, not Tony Abbott. He and others lack the spine to stand up to her and to temper the destructive influence she is having on the once-small-l Liberals. Credlin is the Liberal's equivalent of the misnamed "faceless men" of the Labor Party and her vision is frighteningly narrow.

Patricia 13 December 2011

"... we felt we had a particular moral obligation to act decently and generously."
Do we not always have this obligation towards each other?
Hindsight provides the 20/20 vision that contemporary, political egos render invisible.

Kay Bushnell 13 December 2011

In the years immediately following the Second World War the main political parties n Australia had moved closer together in policies. In particular on econmics and were in thorough agreement - Keynesianism - and this was written into the original Liberal Constitution.
Sadly, the present Liberal leader has eyes only on the next election and his tactics are to criticise everything - rather than to selectively blame and praise the actions of the government.

Bob Corcoran 13 December 2011

I get the feeling tht Mr. Howard is driving the future of the Liberal Party from behind the back lines.

He seems to be popping up everywhere.

Catching up 13 December 2011

REcords released last week show that there were 121,000 Vietnamese refugees, not the ever increasing numbers quoted by John.

That aside Fraser was more generous and decent than anyone since, with Hawke and Howard being the two meanest in the country.

However, the "acceptance of refugees" is not the point as it is voluntary - the people covered by the refugee convention are only asylum seekers.

Marilyn Shepherd 13 December 2011

I was then proud to be an Australian who lived in this part of the world. Now I ashamed to name myself as an Australian largely due to the way we so cruelly and selfishly have treated those who seek shelter on our shores. This is not our land. We have been given it i trust and we have abused that trust.

graham patison 14 December 2011

Well the government lost on another dirty idea today when the High Court ruled that an Afghan boys mother was his immediate family.

Marilyn Shepherd 14 December 2011

"O tempora, O mores" as Whitlam might quote Cicero. I hesitate to label Tony Abbott a latter day Cataline but the lengths a political opponent like Cataline might have gone to to win power when Cicero was Consul require a firm rebuttal by a present day Cicero. Alas the only MP who might rival Cicero's oratory sits not on the Government benches but among the shadowy ranks of the Opposition - Malcolm Turnbull.

Uncle Pat 15 December 2011

Similar articles

What matters in Qantas confrontation

9 Comments
Brian Lawrence | 01 November 2011

QantasThe Qantas industrial dispute is likely to make a major contribution to the history of Australian industrial relations. The important issue is whether Qantas should have been required to threaten substantial damage to itself and to the national economy before it could gain access to arbitration.


Wreckers at work in leaky Labor

9 Comments
John Warhurst | 02 November 2011

leaky tapThe Gillard cabinet leaks are a sure sign of government instability. The worst aspect of the leaks is the likelihood that they are the product not just of understandable policy differences, but of leadership destabilisation.


Gillard's gambling problem

18 Comments
Michael Mullins | 31 October 2011

Poker Machine

Care for problem gamblers needs to be balanced against care for workers whose jobs are threatened by proposed reforms. Otherwise, the Gillard Government is open to the accusation that it is putting its own political survival ahead of the wellbeing of these workers.


CHOGM and the Common Good

6 Comments
Jack de Groot | 28 October 2011

CHOGMIf every economic decision has a moral consequence then the voice of the most marginalised should be amplified in economic discussions. CHOGM provides an opportunity to devise new solutions based on justice and compassion. 


Self-interest as a path to Aboriginal flourishing

6 Comments
Dan O'Donovan | 28 October 2011

Noel Pearson

Noel Pearson sees self-interest as key to the flourishing of Aboriginal communities. But traditionally self-interest did not occur to the Aboriginal mentality. In the pre-'scientific kinship system, everything was inter-related and inter-dependent. Can the concepts co-exist?