Political opinion polls matter

1 Comment

Political opinion polls matterPolls matter. Much of the flesh of an election year grows on a skeleton made up of public opinion polls. The whole political community hangs on the ups and downs of polls as they are published from week to week. In many ways, polls are markers on the campaign journey.

The major newspapers put great store on their own polls because of the guaranteed news content they provide. The Australian has its Newspoll and the Melbourne Age and the Sydney Morning Herald have the ACNielsen poll.

There are other polls that get coverage too, including the Galaxy and Morgan polls. Peter Brent’s chapter on the polls in The Crikey Guide to the 2007 Federal Election, shortly to hit the bookstores, is well worth a look for a fuller account.

Explaining the movement of the polls always has its traps for commentators. They can jump around. One useful guide is the Reuters Poll Trend, which tries to even out volatility and provide a moving average of Newspoll, ACNielsen and Morgan. Reuters confirms that Labor remains well ahead. In fact the government has trailed by more than 10% in each Poll Trend since Rudd became Labor leader.

The commercial nature of the polls and the investment in them by the major media outlets mean that their political journalists can suffer from tunnel vision. There is little problem with this when the message of the different polls seems similar, as appears to be the case at the moment with the voting attention of respondents for the forthcoming election.

But when there is an apparent difference, as there has been over the last fortnight with the results on preferred prime minister, there is not enough comparative analysis. Newspoll showed Howard drawing almost level with Rudd two weeks ago and The Australian made a big fuss about this trend.

Political opinion polls matterA week later ACNielsen reported that Rudd was still well ahead on this same question. Yet on the following day The Australian’s team of journalists continued to discuss its poll from the previous week without a mention of the competitor poll that was showing something different. This is misleading and may be explained by commercial imperatives, which get in the way of more informative analysis.

For all their technical traps — margins of error and design questions first of all — the second most important feature of the polls is that they are only as good as the interpretation that accompanies them. There are so many stories that can be pulled from any poll. Readers rely on the judgment of editors and senior journalists.

Sometimes people of good will can disagree. Sometimes commentators see only what they want to see. The Australian, two weeks ago, made a judgment call to run with John Howard’s improvement in the preferred prime minister contest rather than the clear advantage that Labor still held in the party polls. Its reading of that poll was widely criticized by bloggers as biased.

Political opinion polls matterThen came an extraordinary outburst by an Australian editorial that defended its objectivity and fearless regard for the truth. The general tone of that editorial, mentioning in a derogatory fashion people like Brent, described as the Mumble blogger but who is also a PhD student in political science at the Australian National University, shows in the damning concluding sentence: "We just don’t think many of our critics have any real clue about polling and very little practical experience of politics".

The great thing about interpreting polls and predicting election results is that eventually there will be winners and losers and all commentators will get our come-uppance. If the government is returned The Australian will think it deserves to have the last laugh for picking it. If Labor prevails then the newspaper might be brought to account, just as those who said encouraging things about Latham’s Labor during 2004 were later laughed at for their opinion.

 

 

submit a comment

Existing comments

Peter Brent's essay in the Crikey Guide to the 2007 Federal Election is certainly one of the book's highlights. With The Australian pushing any rise in Howard's "preferred PM" polling, it's worth remembering one of the points Brent makes: that there's no evidence whatsoever that people's answer to this question relate in any way to their eventual voting patterns.
Stilgherrian | 29 July 2007


Similar Articles

The disappearing distinction between Labor and Coalition welfare policy

  • Philip Mendes
  • 25 July 2007

The ALP has historically been committed to government intervention in the free market to promote a fairer distribution of income. However, since Hawke and Keating, the ALP moved towards a free market agenda focusing on the alleviation of poverty rather than structural change.

READ MORE

Let's share the burden of overcoming Muslim extremism

  • Saeed Saeed
  • 25 July 2007

Foreign Affairs Minister Alexander Downer said recently: "Muslim extremists are a Muslim issue - not ours." The fault with this view is that it transfers ownership of this challenge from the elected leaders to a minority group who simply don’t have the resources to deal with such a global crisis.

READ MORE

We've updated our privacy policy.

Click to review