A- A A+

Best of 2012: Fear the politicians of the future

1 Comment
Ellena Savage |  10 January 2013

Angry male silhouette with raised fistIf my short tenure in university politics gave me anything, it is an appreciation for non-politicians. Like Barbara Ramjan and journalist Lindsay Foyle, who both had dealings with young and rabid student politicians 35 years ago, I now have some dirt on the cabinet of the future, and I know who I'm not voting for.

I coedited the student newspaper in the final year of my BA. My coeditors and I came from different political backgrounds, and were elected on a politically unaligned ticket, giving and receiving our electoral preferences to and from various left and centre-left factions.

The tenure itself was hard work; learning to make a magazine from scratch with only a 2002 iMac and the phone number for a printer, while dealing with the strange demands and personalities of the office-bearers. Our pay rate of around $3.40 per hour perhaps was a little low.

Once in the media office, we decided to remain on peaceful terms with all of the other factions in office. We reasoned that it would make for a better working environment, and a better magazine if every student felt they could contribute, regardless of their politics.

We offered a right of reply to anyone who was challenged or insulted by the contents, and invited the relevant student representatives to respond to challenges levelled against their departments within the same edition.

This policy of openness quickly found us completely alienated from every faction we refused to make exceptions for. The rift between politicians and journalists was quickly established.

Nothing terrible happened — I wish I had more battle tales to recount. But then, I am lucky to not have been made a target of some A-type android's personality disorder. In previous years, women had been sexually harassed by opponents, property stolen and sabotaged, and people of all political bents had been smeared.

While everything that happens in the student unions around Australia is completely, mind-blowingly important, campus election weeks are by far the most stressful times in the political calendar. Over the three years I campaigned in elections for myself and others, I witnessed a good many tears spill onto hyper-coloured party T-shirts. Elections are a rollercoaster of betrayals, dodged regulations, and primary-school-grade bullying.

The worst offenders are usually campaigners who sit between the centre and the hard right of politics — those who have a real future in party politics in Australia — and the targets of their bullying are usually on the fringe left — often women and queer men engaged in activism as opposed to career politics.

While there are certainly creeps and bullies on both sides of the political binary, the right, in my experience, does seem to produce the most visible offenders. And they're usually male.

To be staunchly against unionism generally, and simultaneously be involved in a student union with the express desire to disrupt it, well, that's a cry for help. It takes an aggressive kind of personality.

Ramjan's allegations against Abbott didn't surprise me. Actually, I am surprised by the mildness of the alleged harassment. In the real world, shouting and throwing a punch next to someone's head in a rage is a seriously harassing act. But in the strange, tense world of student politics, the honest brutality of the act sounds preferable to the slow and steady harassment and character attacks that sustain student politicians these days.

Abbott is right to point to inexperience and immaturity driving the 'silly' behaviour of student pollies. But we should take note that these bullies are there to cut their teeth for state or federal politics later in their careers. Where they are not held accountable for their indiscretions, their histories follow them into parliament.

Politicians of all ages should be held to higher standards than the rest of us, because the rest of us do not purport to represent collective values and act on such preposterous claims.

Student politicians continue to punch walls in front of each other, plot to smear their peers, and generally create atmospheres of humiliation and harassment for their own political gain. Yes, the smaller the gain, the dirtier the fight. And these people, they are our future. So be afraid. 

Ellena SavageEllena Savage is a Melbourne writer who edits Middlebrow, the arts liftout in The Lifted Brow



Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

The Australian hung parliament has certainly been a 'toxic' environment since the last election.
Some policies of major political parties will have even even more 'toxic' consequences.
The United Nations World Health Organisation estimates that over 150 000 people are already dying annually from the effects of climate change, but the major parties are all for ramping up the production of fossil fuels, rather than replacing them with renewables. No wonder the world is heading for a 'toxic' 4 to 6 degree rise in temperature by 2100. Extreme weather events are already the new norm! Are we prepared to let our political leaders join other regressive world leaders in dragging the world community into more extreme weather events?
We are one of the richest countries in the world but the World Millennium Goals are now being compromised, rather than being revised upwards. How 'toxic' for the world's poor!
Refugees coming here on leaky boats are being deported to Nauru, to be left there indefinitely. How 'toxic' for these poor people, and for Australia's international reputation!
The current 'toxic' Jobsearch allowance is putting many poor families below the poverty line.
Let's advocate for reversals of 'toxic' parliamentary behaviour and 'toxic' policies.

George Allen 13 January 2013

Similar articles

Sting in the tail of Gillard charities red tape reduction

Paul O'Callaghan | 07 November 2012

Last week, the Federal Government streamlined bureaucracy when it legislated for a single body to regulate charities and not for profits. But it is also pursuing a new charity tax under the guise of cracking down on abuse of the current system, by 'better targeting of tax concessions'. This could force agencies to downsize programs that support disadvantaged Australians.

Beyond the Obama euphoria

Jim McDermott | 08 November 2012

In recent weeks the US Catholic bishops insisted letters be read at Mass pushing congregations to vote Republican. That approach has been repudiated twice now. At some point they would be wise to reconsider their approach. A voice in the wilderness has its place, but so does reasoned, respectful discourse.

America's choice through Australian eyes

Tony Kevin | 01 November 2012

Obama and RomneyIf citizens of other nations could vote, it should be Obama by a mile! Outsiders are perplexed by polling that suggests a cliffhanger in the contest between the incumbent Obama and the Republican compromise candidate Romney. The issues – many of which are vital for Australia – are clear, but the outcome is not.

Cup Day losses to soar with betting apps

Michael Mullins | 05 November 2012

Poker MachinesAustralians are expected to spend $60.6 million in betting on tomorrow’s Melbourne Cup, an increase of 7.5 per cent since last year. But while the majority of bets will be placed in person at the TAB, online and mobile betting is rising rapidly. Because this form of gambling is particularly susceptible to impulse behaviour, pre-commitment laws are essential.

Labor excises its moral compass

Binoy Kampmark | 31 October 2012

Moral CompassIn politics, hypocrisy is a natural condition. On Tuesday, it became evident that refugee policy is the last thing that should be made by the Australian government. Gillard has now achieved something Howard could only dream of, and shown Labor can play the game of hypocrisy as well as any.