A- A A+

Ending family violence in culturally diverse Australia

8 Comments
Jasmeet Sahi |  21 February 2016

Violence in the family is not a cultural thing, but all cultures have different ways of addressing it. What might be suitable for an Anglo population may not be appropriate for other cultural groups. Understanding cultural nuances and having differentiation in approaches to family violence is therefore crucial to ending it in all Australian homes.

Indian women and children flee the spectre of family violenceI was raised in India, where I saw the value given to respecting elders, obeying them, being compliant and maintaining good relations with family members.

The family and its unity is where a lot of Indians derive their sense of identity. Nobody wants to be that family that airs its dirty laundry in public. Women learn early in life that it is paramount to maintain calm and peace in a family home. Voicing dissent, raising arguments is not the way to achieve this.

Men learn these things too, but often it is seen as the woman's obligation to ensure them. Good Indian girls learn how to be industrious enough to cope with raised tempers and irritable family members, and still be pleasing, not only at home but also socially. This may not be a female Indian experience alone.

Australia's first Royal Commission into Family Violence was set up a year ago on 22 February with a focus on system improvement for finding ways to prevent family violence in Victoria. At the time, Commissioner Marcia Neave AO said that determining where the money goes and where it might be required would be a large part of what the Commission ascertains.

In less than six weeks time, on 29 March, the Royal Commission is due to provide its report and recommendations to the government. What will this change?

Research indicates that cultural values and immigration status compound the complexities in family violence scenarios for women from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) backgrounds.

Although there is limited information and no national data available on the prevalence of violence against women from CALD backgrounds, it is known that they are generally less likely than other groups of women to report domestic violence, for several socio-cultural reasons.

Hearing Her Voice reportAccording to the Department of Social Services report Hearing Her Voice, drawn from conversations with CALD women and their children, these include a lack of support networks, socioeconomic disadvantage, language barriers, community pressure and limited knowledge about their rights and Australia's laws.

This is where local community-based programs come to the rescue.

Sunila Shrivastava of Hum Tum, a task force working with victims of family violence, primarily within the Indian communities in the eastern and southeastern suburbs of Melbourne, says that often it is only with the influence of such programs that people find the courage to report incidents and apply for intervention orders against a perpetrating family member.

In the Indian context, perpetrating family members may mean the spouse or even the in-laws.

Shrivastava speaks of the difficulties victims suffer if they have recently migrated to Australia and feel the pressure to acquiesce to social norms and values they have learnt in India in the face of abuse or neglect inside the family home. Unfortunately a lack of resources and funds limits the support that programs such as Hum Tum can offer.

On the first day of the public hearings of the Royal Commission into Family Violence in July last year, submissions highlighted that almost all community programs and service providers were overwhelmed with work and severely underfunded. They also indicated that empowering communities to develop local approaches to preventing and tackling family violence was important.

I wonder if they will see the connection between these two realities and the value that culturally diverse organisations can bring to the reduction of family violence in many homes in Australia. What kind of support can these organisations hope for from the Royal Commission next month?

 


Jasmeet SahiJasmeet Sahi is a Melbourne-based writer and editor.

If you or someone you know is impacted by sexual assault, family or domestic violence, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or visit www.1800RESPECT.org.au. In an emergency, call 000.

Main image: Chris Johnston

 


Jasmeet Sahi

Recent articles by this author


Comments

Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

Family violence is a kind of cannibalism. Sensing the danger of taking out its frustrations on an outsider with an equal power to respond punitively, the compressed aggressor eats its own.

Roy Chen Yee 19 February 2016

A terrific - and important - article…I hope that many people read it and take on board its contents. Thank you Jasmeet!

Christine Nicholls 22 February 2016

We all need to learn to be kind to each other. You don’t have to like someone but we do all need kindness. Family violence etc and women who have learned to be silent, is not just a problem for Indian families. From silence, I also learned how to survive, how to recognise those motivated by power, the manipulator and the soft do-gooder who has no actual idea. However, a heartfelt grateful thank you to all those who have been kind throughout my life and to all those who uplift the spirit. Please God, I always do the same.

jane 22 February 2016

"Violence in the family is not a cultural thing". It may not be part of a culture, but it is regularly found in primitive dog-eat-dog situations where 'might is right', and men traditionally 'lorded it over their women'. Such traditions of exercising power are only slowly and reluctantly given up, until men and societies evolve sufficiently to appreciate the ideal of selfless love, for 'Love changes everything', and the light of love dispels the dark instincts and traditions that cause so many problems in the lives of families, communities and nations.

Robert Liddy 22 February 2016

An insightful article addressing the grassroots-level needs to address an intricate and complex problem that often goes unspoken. Cultural sensitivity and meaningful, sensible solutions to help women become speak up and then work towards becoming self-sufficient within their communities is vital. Glad to see you addressing such an issue and bringing out the importance of help at the community level. Looking forward to more! Love, Jo

Jyotsna 22 February 2016

I'm not from Indian background, but a mixture of European backgrounds like a lot of 4th or 5th generation white Australians), but I can totally relate to Jasmeet's view of traditional family culture in India. It's probably the reason I was baffled by the realisation of the amount of domestic violence in Australia. It wasn't that my father was at all violent or even verbally of psychologically abusive, but in the normal course of family dramas and arguments, my mother was always the peacemaker and usually sacrificed have "her say" for the sake of family unity, and not wanting to make a mountain out a of molehill. It wasn't until I started to mature that I appreciated my mother's actions were far from passive - but courageous and loving.

Aurelius 23 February 2016

Excellent article Jasmeet!!!

Navika 25 February 2016

Excellent article Jasmeet!

Suparb 27 February 2016

Similar articles

Self-care as political warfare

4 Comments
Somayra Ismailjee | 24 February 2016

Audre LordeFeminist writer Audre Lorde wrote that 'Caring for myself is not self-indulgence, it is self-preservation, and that is an act of political warfare.' In medical professions, the term 'self-care' originated in reference to the self-management of illness. Self-care, however, also exists in the context of social justice, extending beyond physical wellness to cater for a holistic approach that includes emotional, mental and spiritual fulfilment. The need for this is rooted in the burden of oppression.


The baby Asha problem in Australia's refugee policy

3 Comments
Binoy Kampmark | 24 February 2016

Baby AshaOn Sunday, Immigration Minister Peter Dutton seemingly relented, allowing the child to be released into community detention rather than carting her off to Nauru. It has, however, been made clear that this is no prelude to settlement in Australia. Dutton's line goes to evenness in policy: 'We are going to have a consistency approach here ... intelligence out of Indonesia recently was that people smugglers were reporting ... there was going to be a change in policy.' None of these arguments passes muster.


Baby Asha and the pyramid of suffering

4 Comments
Kate Galloway | 24 February 2016

Baby AshaIt is right and good that the outpouring of community and professional goodwill has at least delayed the return of baby Asha to what are reported to be the terrible conditions of the detention centre on Nauru. But Australia's asylum seeker laws involve unresolved systemic issues that such wins cannot by themselves resolve. Widespread community focus on individual cases such as that of baby Asha may in fact prevent action on the deeper issues from gaining traction.


Shedding light on elder abuse

7 Comments
Gillian Bouras | 23 February 2016

Elderly person face half in shadowElder abuse resembles child abuse in its iceberg qualities: both have received little attention until comparatively recently. In the case of elder abuse, very few cases ever come to court: old people are as helpless as children, similarly unable to plead their own cases, and afraid to: they have little power. The Yiddish proverb springs to mind: If you can't bite, don't show your teeth. The most consistent offenders, sad to say, are family members, who are often adept at exploiting the fear that is part of ageing.


When it's right to break the law

18 Comments
Andrew Hamilton | 18 February 2016

Bearded protestor at #LetThemStay rally in BrisbaneIt is common for people to break the law. People fail to move on when instructed by police, evade tax, drive too fast, keep silent about abuse, trespass on military facilities, and drive when drunk. Many people assert that it is never right to break a law duly enacted by the government. From this principle it follows that anyone offering sanctuary to people who seek protection in Australia is acting wrongly. This blanket condemnation of law breaking runs against our inherited moral tradition.