A- A A+

Children's flourishing inside and outside the nuclear family

3 Comments
Andrew Hamilton |  11 May 2017

 

Public celebrations of family life such as the International Day of Families should be uncontroversial.

Little girl playing TwisterBut they sometimes focus on the definition of the family, with the claims of the stable nuclear family of father, mother and children set against the claims of other kinds of family groupings — same sex couples, single parents, blended families and serial partners, for example. The discussion can then become acrimonious.

Definitions are important, as is reflection on the challenges facing each kind of family grouping. But these discussions should not distract from such larger questions as: why are families of any description important, and what qualities are needed if they are to be effective?

In any society families are important because in them children are nurtured so that they become connected and contributing members of society. The best environment for this to happen, whatever the shape of the family, is one that is stable, predictable, affectionate and formative.

Although children are resilient and can grow into emotionally mature adults even in the face of obstacles caused by sickness, death, poverty, violence or separation, their path will be very demanding.

No family, of course, is ideal. The ideal Christian family in which children grow up with a loving mother and father in a life-long relationship, for example, is admirable but rare in practice, just as are the ideal families of any culture. The varied shapes and the differing quality of relationships that families display are a fact of life.

The family background of many disadvantaged and vulnerable children is far from ideal. They may have experienced and witnessed family violence; the relationship between their father and mother may often be broken or unstable; they may have left home early, become homeless, suffer mental or physical illness, lack education and have no skills in building and keeping relationships. They long for a home that they have never found.

The effects of such deprivation both on the child and on society can be catastrophic. Left to themselves children may grow into adults who are unable to form deep and non-violent relationships, who lack the social skills and confidence to learn systematically or to find work.

 

"The nuclear family is a network of relationships between parents and children. But it can be understood fully and its resources appreciated only when we attend to the wider network of relationships that govern its flourishing."

 

They will draw on the costly resources of the health system, the welfare system and the justice system. If they are to overcome the effects of life in a dysfunctional family they will need people from outside their family circle to hang in with them, show them how to form good relationships and to connect with society.

In many societies deficits in family life are compensated for within the extended family. In Australia grandparents often have a huge and positive influence on their grandchildren, particularly where the parents are separated. In many cultures uncles and aunts and cousins also take responsibility for the welfare of children after death or separation strikes the nuclear family.

In other cultures, too, the welfare of children is everyone's responsibility. The village is an extension of the family. So when children are disadvantaged, they become everyone's care. This suggests that our celebration and imagining of family life should reach beyond the nuclear to embrace the extended family. The nuclear family is a network of relationships between parents and children. But it can be understood fully and its resources appreciated only when we attend to the wider network of relationships that govern its flourishing.

The International Day of Families is an occasion for gratitude for the part that families have played in the building of the society we have inherited and its values. Public achievement is usually measured by financial and professional success or by celebrity. The contribution made by ordinary families who would not think themselves special to building a peaceful and hopeful society, however, is greater.

The day also invites us to keep in mind people whose memories of family life are a nightmare, and to ask how can we help people deprived of good parenting to connect with society and to build the good personal and working relationships that will enable them to form stable families.

 


Andrew HamiltonAndrew Hamilton is consulting editor of Eureka Street.

 



Comments

Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

The last paragraph of this great article should resonate with all Victorians as our government seeks higher walls and heavier punishments for often frustrated, desperate kids who have broken our laws. The state too is a dysfunctional family and we are in a sense responsible aunts and uncles to those kids. These kids need a particular kind of mercy - not perceived justice that will prevent their growth.

margaret McDonald 15 May 2017

Focusing on the definition of 'family' or, worse, a single definition of an 'ideal family' to the exclusion of all others is, as Andrew suggests, less than helpful. The common idea of a nuclear family (a man, a woman, a boy for him and a girl for her, all co-dependent and self contained) is a relatively recent idea. Anyone who has done any family history will know that, except perhaps among the rich, or except for the first generation immigrant, the exception was the rule. Widows with children were frequent, melded families where one or more of the parents had been previously married were common. Older daughters took younger, orphaned, siblings under their wings and into their homes. Grandparents cared for grandchildren, uncles and aunts for nephews and nieces, and their were more than a few examples of children being taken in by friends. And even when the biological mother and father were present, the nurturing group spread to all these others. Isn't there an account in he gospels of Jesus, as a 12 year old, travelling to and from Jerusalem with kith and kin?

Ginger Meggs 15 May 2017

Thank-you, Andrew, for another excellent article and so timely for the current situation.

Anne 19 May 2017

Similar articles

Digital solutions to political reform

8 Comments
Kate Galloway | 13 April 2017

People voting using iPhones. Cartoon by Chris JohnstonThere are reasons to be concerned about the capacity of a government to govern in the current brief election cycle, and in dealing with what some describe as a 'hostile senate'. But the networked world we inhabit also calls into question the way in which politicians might be accountable to the public. Rather than focusing on changes to a system of governance derived from a different era, we should be asking what are the implications of emergent technologies on the way in which we are governed.


Waiting for the trickle down effect

16 Comments
Frank Brennan | 10 April 2017

Malcolm Turnbull explains 'trickle up effect' whereby welfare cuts fund corporate tax cutsIn an age of 'budget repair', social policy risks becoming just a sidebar to economic policy which is a contest of ideas about how best to grow the size of the pie thereby providing a slice for 'the deserving poor' without having to redistribute too much of the pie, while 'the undeserving poor' drop off the edge as they would have anyway. For those of us schooled in Catholic social teaching, the so-called 'undeserving poor' are the litmus test of our commitment to the human dignity of all persons.


Marr withers 'White Queen' Pauline

16 Comments
Irfan Yusuf | 05 April 2017

Pauline Hanson on the cover of David Marr's Quarterly Essay The White QueenHanson doesn't pretend to be religious. Her anti-Islam agenda isn't inspired by some rightwing evangelical passion like Danny Nalliah's nor by a conservative moralistic Catholicism like Cory Bernardi's. But she clearly can feel the pulse of many in the electorate who worry about terrorism and national security. Hanson's politics really only work when there is a 'them' for 'us' to worry about. But where does she get this idea that Islam is not a religion but an ideology?


Tackling wealth inequality through justice reinvestment

10 Comments
Ann Deslandes | 31 March 2017

Lady Justice gazes favourably upon restorative justice model. Cartoon by Chris JohnstonAustralia was rated as the top destination for millionaire migrants in 2016 for the second year in a row. Meanwhile the latest Australian Institute of Health and Welfare reveal high correlations between prison entrance and indicators of entrenched poverty and discrimination. If we want our system for justice to amount to something more than a mirror of our inability to distribute wealth and opportunity evenly, we need to address the undeniable role wealth inequality has in putting people in prison.


Job-sharing could make for a more inclusive parliament

3 Comments
John Warhurst | 30 March 2017

Kate EllisThe announcement by Kate Ellis, the 39 year old federal Labor MP for Adelaide, of her retirement at the next election to be with her young son came as a surprise. Several Fairfax journalists were dismayed. Stephanie Peatling issued a challenge: 'It's not people who should have to change to make their lives fit politics as we know it. It's politics as we know it that should change.' The immediate issue is gender balance, but the wider context is all types of diversity in parliament.