A- A A+

Remembering, dismembering on World Refugee Day

3 Comments
Andrew Hamilton |  13 June 2017

Refugee family as an incomplete jigsaw puzzle. Cartoon by Chris Johnston

World Refugee Day is a time for remembering. We remember we live in a world of millions of refugees, and that many of our fellow citizens arrived as or are the children of refugees. We also remember what it is like to be a refugee, allowing ourselves to touch, hear, see, smell and taste the bitter stuff of their lives.

We may remember refugees, but in their own lives they are dismembered. The tiles that we take for granted as we shape the mosaic of our ordinary lives have been hacked out of refugees' lives. Many people lost parents, siblings and children in the persecution and the terrors of war they endured in their own lands. With each loss part of themselves also died.

Their ability to plan their own lives, to practice their religion, to meet with like-minded people in order to help shape their society, and to have their children educated were also cut away. Their losses are not just entries in a ledger. They tear at the heart of identity, stripping away the connections that breathe existence into life.

In their flight many were also cut off from their families, from the rhythms of work and rest, from connections with town and village, from communicating in a language that is shared, and from all the things that allow us to call house and nation a home.

When people come to the fences of other nations asking for protection they face further dismemberment. In Australia they have been deprived of what freedom remained to them to shape their lives, forced to live for years cut off from uncontrolled human contact, sometimes separated from family members living in Australia.

Time, the garden of remembering, is for them a desert of dismembering, further separating them from world from which they fled and from the life that they longed to find.

On Manus Island, Nauru and in detention centres they have their self-respect hacked away by a daily regime that takes away their privacy, the civility they had hoped to find from representatives of a democratic government and from the confidence that the canopy of law might shelter them.

They may also have their physical and mental health excised, leaving them prey to depression and anxiety. And when they read contemptuous words spoken about them they feel themselves stripped of all that remains to them — their self-respect as human beings.

 

"The Australian body politic also calls out for re-membering. Over many years it has been stripped of respect of people for their simple humanity, of hospitality to strangers and of compassion for the vulnerable. To re-member is to make whole, to return to integrity."

 

For refugees to remember is a challenge: to remember who they are and to wear their abused humanity as a flag of worth and not of shame.

For Australians, World Refugee Day is a time of remembering. It is a time to remember the human stories of those who have fled from their own nations to seek protection. It is a time to remember and treasure the little things that give shape to our lives — the smells, sounds and sights of our childhood world and their continuity with our lives today, and to remember that for refugees these things have been stripped away. It is a time to remember what has been done to refugees when they came to Australia — to hold in our memory the smell and texture of life on Manus Island and on Nauru, the casual brutality, the mud, the barbed wire borders of their world, the erosion of time, the lies and sneers of politicians who held them there, the slogans that trumped human connection. It is a time for shame and for compassion for a people who have come to this. To remember is first of all not to forget, not to move on. It is the beginning of conversion.

World Refugee Day is also a time for re-membering: for putting back what has been torn apart, for greening boughs that have been stripped of leaves, for fleshing what has withered, for welcoming back what has been rejected. That means demanding the dismembering stop — that people are taken off prison islands, are listened to and heard with justice and respect, that they are reunited with families and allowed to get on with their lives. It also means connecting with people who are isolated, encouraging and paying respect to people who have shown such resilience.

The Australian body politic also calls out for re-membering. Over many years it has been stripped of respect of people for their simple humanity, of hospitality to strangers and of compassion for the vulnerable. To re-member is to make whole, to return to integrity.

 


Andrew HamiltonAndrew Hamilton is consulting editor of Eureka Street.

Tuesday 20 June is World Refugee Day.

 



Comments

Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

If Australia were to embark on a new infrastructure scheme somewhat like the Snowy River Scheme but on the East Coast of Australia, using solar and wind power to turn back into the farm lands, the rain water that currently runs into the ocean, there would be plenty of jobs for Australians and for refugees, not only for building the dams and renewable power plants, but also for processing the new produce from the farms with the new irrigation available.

Robert Liddy 15 June 2017

Thanks to all - most articles appreciated. Sorry to be unable to donate. No money of my own. Sr. B. Ziesing

Bernadette Ziesing 16 June 2017

Thank you indeed, Andy. Lest we forget!

Michael Furtado 17 June 2017

Similar articles

Firing Comey does not make Trump Nixon

5 Comments
Fatima Measham | 11 May 2017

James ComeyReferences to Watergate are flying thick and fast - again. Earlier this week, Donald Trump abruptly dismissed FBI director James Comey in the middle of a probe into Russian interference in the 2016 elections. It is difficult to overstate how bad this move is, and how much it has rattled political and bureaucratic firmaments. There are differences, however, between then and now. Trump is not Nixon, for one thing. Perhaps we can be thankful for that, in that infantile impetuosity is not paired with a much more cunning mind.


Unsocial budget fails health test

3 Comments
Amy Coopes | 15 May 2017

ECG pattern in the shape of a heartNext year marks four decades since promulgation of the seminal Declaration of Alma Ata, which declared health to be a fundamental human right and laid the foundations for what are now widely championed as the social determinants of health. Without action on the social determinants, health policy can be a little like that joke about the cyclopean orthopod who, when confronted with a patient suffering fatal internal bleeding, is interested only in fixing their broken leg. So it is with last week's Budget.


Hope versus humiliation in the Federal Budget

14 Comments
John Falzon | 10 May 2017

Client exiting Centrelink officeIt would be nice to believe, as the Treasurer wants us to, that better times are around the corner. But while wages stagnate and company profits surge, inequality is at its highest since the 1950s. This is not going to get any better any time soon. By 2019, the highest income earners will have received an effective tax cut of 1.5 per cent compared to all other taxpayers who will be paying an extra 0.5 per cent. For young people especially, Budget 2017 boosts inequality instead of building a better future.


'Labor-lite' budget's social welfare report card

5 Comments
Julie Edwards | 10 May 2017

Drug testing with urine sample'Labor-lite' or not, there are many investments contained in the budget which will work towards a more just society, including the securing of funding for the National Disability Insurance Scheme by raising the Medicare levy, and the needs-based approach to school funding, dubbed 'Gonski 2.0'. But among these commitments that seek to create a more equitable Australia, this budget again seeks to vilify welfare recipients, among the most vulnerable members of our community.


Children's flourishing inside and outside the nuclear family

3 Comments
Andrew Hamilton | 12 May 2017

Little girl playing TwisterPublic celebrations of family life such as the International Day of Families should be uncontroversial. But they sometimes focus on the definition of the family, with the claims of the stable nuclear family of father, mother and children set against the claims of other kinds of family groupings. These discussions should not distract from such larger questions as: why are families of any description important, and what qualities are needed if they are to be effective?