Jesuit Publications Publishing ServicesEventsContactSearchPrivacy
Jesuit Publications Eureka Street Current Issue
Current Issue
About
Subscriptions
Advertising
Previous Issues
Links
Nav Bar

BORROWED MEMORIES

The Passion of the Christ, dir. Mel Gibson. The phenomenon preceded the film. As my aunt and I walked into Adelaide’s Norwood multiplex we were handed glossy brochures. Director’s notes? No, a Bible Society Making The Bible Heard production, lavishly illustrated with stills from The Passion. A trio of demographically representative young enthusiasts preluded the screening with the declaration that this film—a ‘true’ story—would change our lives.

Mel Gibson’s interpretation of the Passion is sincere—that much is clear from interviews. If it is not profound—and it certainly is not—then we have not been deceived by Gibson himself. The international publicity accorded the film—from favourable reviews in The Tablet to recommendations by prelates—has, however, blurred the boundaries between cinema art and religious conviction. Discussion, argument, controversy—all that’s healthy. Endorsement is something else.

The film itself? It is simplistic, overwhelmingly violent, and a throwback to a Christian culture that projected evil in graphic human form—devils and wall-eyed, wizened infants. Gibson borrows the full range (including a shaven-eyebrowed Goth Satan), just as he takes his lighting from Caravaggio and his image of Christ in extremis from Matthias Grünewald’s Isenheim Altarpiece. Gruesome, thorn flecked, pocked and torn. But Grünewald painted out of his own Zeitgeist. Gibson is anachronistic—as if his 21st–century cinematic—or spiritual—imagination were not equal to the task.

When the film is not mind-numbingly violent (the scourging seems as long as the chariot race in Ben Hur) it can be moving. The spoken and unspoken communication between mother and son (Maia Morgenstern as Mary, James Caviezel as Jesus) is potent.
Is the film anti-Semitic? Well, it portrays the Sanhedrin as unalloyed in their determination to destroy Jesus (why?—we don’t learn), and while they inveigh against him, Satan (Rosalinda Celentano) glides between their ranks. You decide.

STATION MASTER

The Station Agent, dir. Tom McCarthy. When in the second week of release a film earns double what it made in the first, cinemas know they have a ‘sleeper’ on their hands. The Station Agent is one such film.

This is a story about friendship which moves at a gentle pace but never loses your interest. Factually the plot is simple, yet the character interplay is complex and challenging.

Fin (Peter Dinklage, recently seen in Elf) is a train enthusiast who works in Hoboken, in the back room of a model railway shop. The owner dies and leaves Fin a rural property in New Jersey upon which there is an abandoned train depot, an old railway car and a section of railway track, all of which have stood idle for years.

Fin is a dwarf, tired of stares and tired of being pointed at. He is a man of extraordinary presence who has suffered for being different. The depot has no water or electricity, but it offers peace. It is an opportunity to be left alone.

That aloneness lasts for one night, then to his dismay Fin wakes up to find a hotdog and coffee van parked close by. The van is run by Joe (Bobby Cannavale), a human puppy who gambols around the reticent Fin. Fin doesn’t know whether to pat him or tell him to sit. He is as loquacious as Fin is taciturn.

And then there is Olivia (played by that splendid actress, Patricia Clarkson), a wealthy middle-aged artist who has taken refuge in a cocoon of grief after the death of her son. She first meets Fin when she nearly runs him over.

Three remarkable performances engulf the screen, and result in a wonderfully satisfying film.

This is a first film for writer and director Tom McCarthy, who has previously been a film and television actor.

Some of the best moments have no dialogue at all. In one scene the odd trio take a walk along a disused railway line. For Fin, the distance between sleepers is just about right. For Joe and Olivia, the sleepers are too close together. No, nothing else happens! Just three friends walking along a railway line, but it is an enchanting scene.

There are several scenes which involve abrasive personal confrontation, which I felt were irrelevant, but presumably were introduced for fear of the film becoming cloying. McCarthy need not have worried, because this film is devoid of self-pity or false sentimentality. Indeed, contrary to Hollywood tradition, none of the
relationships go quite where we anticipate, at least not while we’re watching!

At its end, what crises lie ahead are anyone’s guess, but why fret when you’ve just been privileged to spend 90 minutes in the company of these characters?

Don’t miss The Station Agent.

   
Nav Bar - - - - - - -
 

 

current issue | about | subscriptions | advertising | previous issues | links

Reproduction of material from any Jesuit Publications pages
without written prior permission is strictly prohibited.
Copyright 2002 Jesuit Publications
PO Box 553 Richmond VIC 3121 Australia
Tel +61 3 9427 7311, Fax +61 3 9428 4450