Eva Cox on macho economics and the feminist lens

1 Comment


In many ways, feminism has pushed the boundaries of where and how women participate in the economy. But their presence across different industries has not necessarily made conditions better for all, as expected. So what is still getting in the way?

Eva Cox is a prominent Australian academic and feminist who has spent decades agitating for a more civil society. She joins us to discuss the impact of neoliberal economic models on women, including its emphasis on individualism. She also talks about the social as an essential lens, touching on a range of things such race, universal basic income, and social media.

Soundcloud | iTunes



Fatima MeashamFatima Measham is a Eureka Street consulting editor. She co-hosts the ChatterSquare podcast, tweets as @foomeister and blogs on Medium.

Topic tags: Fatima Measham, Eva Cox, feminism, economics, society



submit a comment

Existing comments

Eva Cox is inspirational and reminds us not to buy into 'innovative' discourse that puts a price on connection - we are not biscuits on a market shelf! Eva's presentation at "The Power to Persuade 2015" sparked my interest and a paper on social capital - it indeed hasn't always been this way.
Belinda | 14 February 2018

Similar Articles

ChatterSquare: Kate Galloway on lawyers in a tech-driven world

  • Podcast
  • 01 August 2017

What are the implications for the legal profession as blockchain technologies, smart contracts and apps shift our approach to matters of law? Where do lawyers fit into algorithm-driven decisions and digital access to information? Kate Galloway discusses how tech is disrupting the way we think about lawyering, and the ethical problems it poses. 


ChatterSquare: Cardinal Luis Tagle on contemporary life and politics

  • Podcast
  • 05 July 2017

Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle is the Archbishop of Manila and president of Caritas International. He is associated with Pope Francis in terms of pastoral sensibility. In this episode of ChatterSquare, he tackles some of the uneasy questions of our time. What does leadership look like in polarised and violent places? How do we hold together diversity within the Catholic Church? How can religious wisdom be brought to bear on public life without crossing the line between church and state?