: A publication of Jesuit Communications Australia
Podcasts (all articles)  |  Join us on Facebook   |  Follow us on Twitter
EUREKA STREET  
Search our site
You can search by topic, author, article title and keywords.
 

 

 

 

Advertisement



Advertisement

Advertisement

1pix
smaller font larger font print article Email this Article to a Friend Bookmark and Share
Home ยป Vol 22 No 18 > Ethical dilemmas on safari in Africa
POLITICS

Ethical dilemmas on safari in Africa

John Warhurst September 13, 2012

'African Ethics' by Chris JohnstonI've just returned from a 14-day holiday in Kenya and Uganda, taking part with my daughter in a tour called 'Game Parks and Gorillas'. We began our camping tour at Acacia Camp in Karen, a suburb of Nairobi named after Karen Blixen of Out of Africa fame. 

It was a wonderful opportunity, including even the 13 cramped nights in a smallish tent with my adult daughter. I was easily the oldest in our group. I'd recommend the whole experience to anyone who is adventurous. 

You will be exhilarated by the extraordinary quantity and range of wildlife to be found in the many national parks and game reserves, like the Masai Mara in the Rift valley in Kenya: elephants, giraffes, lions, rhinos, hippos, zebras and remarkable birdlife. We had the privilege of trekking into the Bwindi Impenetrable National Park in far south-west Uganda to see one family among the 700 remaining mountain gorillas.

But even though the prime focus is on the wildlife, no tourist can avoid thinking about the ethical issues raised by tourism in poor countries. The contrasts in circumstances between tourists and locals were clear, and would have been even clearer if we had been at the upper end of the tourism industry. 

Everywhere you go, you are invited to help the local people in various ways, including financially and through volunteering. Tourism itself makes a significant contribution to their community well-being through employment and investment, as our guide kept telling us, even though some locals complained about the inequitable way tourism revenue was distributed between central and local government. Nevertheless local communities certainly seemed to benefit from tourist spending.

The ethical issues that we came to face are not new at all, and I have no answers other than to always try to conduct oneself with sensitivity and generosity. As our group talked among ourselves, different reactions emerged to the obvious poverty and need around us. 

We also worried about the reliability, and even probity, of those we might help. How could the credentials of those seeking assistance be tested? What were the best options among the many possibilities on offer?

One set of issues is about the choices available to those who want to help and have the means to do so. I was struck simultaneously by the needs of threatened animal species and by needs of children in poverty. 

All of us who trekked were convinced of the threats that economic developments posed to the remaining mountain gorillas and most of us wanted to do what we could to help. Yet just the next day at a local primary school near Kabale, called Little Angels, for orphaned and poor children several of our group also signed up for a $600 per year child sponsorship commitment. 

Back in Nairobi on our last day we learned at the Dorothy Sheldrick Wildlife Trust that we could sponsor an orphaned elephant for $60 per year, as one young Canadian couple in our group had already done. These needs are not necessarily directly competing, though indirectly they are, as most people have to choose their commitments carefully.

A second set of issues, perhaps even more difficult, is about the personal interactions with those around you. There are lots of beggars, but no guidelines. Whatever you can give is never enough but you can't realistically respond to every request. There is also the matter of bargaining with traders, not to mention normal commercial interactions. The amounts are often small, and haggling is encouraged in the guidebooks and by our local assistants. Yet isn't there something mean about driving a price down from our positions of greater wealth and power or complaining because a barman seems to be trying to rip you off on the price of a beer?

There are no simple answers. In the end we all react differently and in many cases spontaneously to what we see in these situations. We have existing commitments and in many cases limited means. Perhaps that's all we can usefully say but the issues should still be talked about.


John WarhurstJohn Warhurst is an Emeritus Professor of Political Science at the Australian National University and a Canberra Times columnist.


 

Bookmark and Share

Enjoyed this article? To ensure that Eureka Street can continue its 20 year publishing tradition, click here to make a donation to Eureka Street.

To email to a friend, click here.

 

COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE

 

Submitted feedback is moderated. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Name:
Email:
Comments:
Word Count: 0
(please limit to 200)
 


SUBMITTED COMMENTS

 

Michael parer14 Sep 2012

John Well said after 11 years volunteering/investing/etc in Cambodia after a decade in the 90s from Monash helping set up the Open Uni of Zim. I see your deli as as real as is the Aid industry and AusAID's jargon. We each resolve these deli as and we rich wealthy Aussies are most generous but choices must be made and we get it right 51% of the time. For me in Norton Uni, Developing Cambodia by Degrees and our CDT Rubber Plantation the aim is wealth creation plus professo al development to remove their Aid Dependency. FORCE Mike Parer mparer33@gmail.com


Molly Moran14 Sep 2012

Another option I and many take is to buy from Fair Trade outlets here in Australia. A wide diversity of gifts is made by skilled producers and their working conditions are non exploiting.Win-Win.


Stephanie Tonkin16 Sep 2012

John your comment about haggling to get an ever lower price from a trader where our financial circumstances are invariably superior, rings true with me. I agree that even though the answers are hard to find, the issues have to stay on the table for discussion. Thanks for thoughtful reflections.


Previous Articles by this Author

POLITICS

'Lame duck' governments and democracy  

Duck with foot in a splintThe Coalition's characterisation of the Gillard Government as a lame duck is a tactic to slow down decision-making over the next four months. A government has every right not just to keep the wheels turning but to continue to try to implement its program even if it is just trying to improve its chances of re-election.


POLITICS

Downer and Costello's murky world of political lobbying  

MegaphoneIn days past the 'consultancy' activity of former senior politicians was cloaked in respectability and not perceived as being at the hands-on end of lobbying. That pretence has now ended and Alexander Downer and Peter Costello are good examples. It is an unhealthy development with plenty of room for conflicts of interest.


POLITICS

Outsized party power distorts democracy  

crossed wiresWhat stands out most from the pre-selection defeat of ACT Liberal Senator Gary Humphries is that less than 200 pre-selectors voted. The power of this small pre-selectorate points to a broader problem in Australian politics. While the major parties are in decline as membership based organisations, they retain disproportionate power.


POLITICS

Gillard's election year crash course  

Julia Gillard and Nova PerisGillard's pick of Nova Peris as Labor candidate for the Senate in the Northern Territory could be a signal that she will try to get on the front foot this year. Since her famous misogyny speech last October, she may have decided not to die wondering but to crash through or crash. This poses an interesting dilemma for Abbott and his team.


POLITICS

Minority Government stands the test of time  

Dented armourWhatever happens now there will be no election until March 2013 at the earliest. This means the Gillard Labor Government will go almost full term despite relentless pressure from the Opposition, a hung parliament and a raft of controversies. But survival is not the same as victory. It has come at a cost.


POLITICS

The Tony Abbott gender gap  

Tony AbbottThe emphasis on the relationship between Tony Abbott and women is fuelled by opinion polls that consistently show that he is less popular with women voters. However, undue concentration on the role of gender in shaping voter choice serves to downplay other very interesting variations.


POLITICS

Same sex marriage and the republic  

Gay Australian flagIf same sex marriage continues to gain momentum around the Western world then the Australian debate will not go away. But should international interest fade then it probably will in Australia too. Whatever the future of the republic debate in Australia it is not of the same international character and therefore harder to sustain.


POLITICS

Perils of the Greens' moral vanity  

Standing on a soapboxThe Greens have been accused of self-righteousness leading to an unwillingness to compromise. Yet the most inflexible party in the current parliament has been the Coalition, led by Tony 'Mr No' Abbott. Getting the balance right between flexibility and maintaining what you stand for is an important lesson for all political parties in parliament.


EDUCATION

50 years since Australia's 'most poisonous debate'  

Labor speechwriter Graham Freudenberg observed that ‘the oldest, deepest, most poisonous debate in Australia has been about government aid to church schools’. The most dramatic episode in the history of church state relations in Australia was the Goulburn schools strike, which took place 50 years ago this month.


POLITICS

Blasting Tony Windsor out of New England  

The Nationals have made their first big play for the next federal election. The recruitment of NSW state independent Richard Torbay to challenge New England incumbent Tony Windsor is either a masterstroke or a revealing insight into their problems and weaknesses as a regional and rural political party.


More from this section

 

How to handle workplace bullies
Luke Williams 27-Aug-2012

Workplace bullyThe Federal Workplace Bullying Inquiry has been told Australian workers are getting soft. There may be a fine line between robust performance management and workplace bullying, but international surveys have repeatedly shown Australian managers fail international benchmarks when it comes to the treatment of their people.


Read more
20 comment(s) about this article.

 

Thoughts on democracy from a martial law baby
Fatima Measham 20-Sep-2012

Ferdinand MarcosToday marks 40 years since martial law took effect in the Philippines. I was born during this time, part of a generation who grew up not knowing any other president. Given the numerous regressions that have occurred since, it is not surprising many Filipinos look back on the Marcos era with nostalgia.


Read more
11 comment(s) about this article.

 

George Orwell's example for Australian journalists
Sarah Burnside 19-Sep-2012

George Orwell - Essays (portion of cover)BBC director general Mark Thompson turned down a proposal to erect a statue of Orwell on the broadcaster's premises because the writer was 'too left-wing'. But political animals of all stripes have long sought to claim Orwell. His political writing transcends both time and ideology.


Read more
9 comment(s) about this article.

 

Workers' just war on construction bullies
Dustin Halse 10-Sep-2012

CFMEU logo

The Federal Opposition blamed the battle between Grocon and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union that brought parts of Melbourne to a standstill on union 'thugs' and 'goons'. But the safety concerns of construction workers are not trivial. Australia's safety record compared with other developed nations is embarrassing.


Read more
10 comment(s) about this article.

 

What the Conventions didn't tell us about November's US election
Jim McDermott 09-Sep-2012

The US finished Act One of its quadrennial orgiastic political kabuki last week with the Republican and Democratic National Conventions. Originally conventions were intended to choose candidates, but today they’re more about motivating the parties’ bases, but really just a total schmozzle.



Read more
3 comment(s) about this article.