A- A A+

How Pope Francis will mend a broken church

21 Comments
Michael Mullins |  13 March 2013

'Broken Church' by Chris Johnston: cartoon depiction of Pope Francis sitting with a model church trying to repair itThe election of a new pope is always an exciting moment for the Church and the world. After weeks of uncertainty, it seems there is good reason to celebrate the election of Pope Francis I, and to congratulate and offer support to him in the immense task ahead.

The excitement of the election of a new pope always brings with it the expectation that he is a new Messiah and has the ability to fix what is broken with the Church. But a more realistic, and indeed preferable, aspiration is for him to acknowledge before all else the ways in which the Church is broken.

With Benedict's resignation acting as a circuit breaker, the world will be looking to Francis to fix the Church. But in reality his role will be to set the Church on the path to recovery, along the lines of the 12 steps of Alcoholics Anonymous. This will begin with the admission that the life of the Church is out of control in the face of clergy sexual abuse and other systemic challenges.

It would seem that such a disposition of humility and honesty is a more effective and inclusive path than attempting to turn the Church upside down. Such a radical approach would further polarise an already divided Church, and we know from his past actions that Francis is more of a bridge builder than a revolutionary. 

He was far from liberation theology, which was seen to be the way to decisively switch the allegiance of the Catholic Church in Latin American from the ruling elites to the poor. He preferred to live with the dictatorships, to plead the cause of the poor, but make his statement by making radical changes to his own lifestyle. 

After his appointment as Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Francis broke with tradition by choosing to live in a small apartment rather than the palatial bishop's residence. This shows his commitment to acting as a bridge between the Church of the poor and the Church of the Latin American elites in a way will hopefully be translated into a determination to walk in the shoes of sexual abuse victims, who have been humiliated by those bound up with the power and privilege of a Church that values the patronage of elites.  

Early commentaries on the new pope are emphasising his distaste for the clericalism that many believe has been a key factor in the Church's sexual abuse of minors. While he failed openly to challenge Argentina's dictatorship of the late 1970s, he was unequivocal in his condemnation of clerical privilege: 'These are today's hypocrites. Those who clericalise the Church. Those who separate the people of God from salvation.'

This is enough to give hope to the Catholic Church and its victims.


Michael MullinsMichael Mullins is editor of Eureka Street.

 

 



Comments

Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

http://www.inthemedievalmiddle.com/2013/03/one-lung-priesthood-and-summa.html Should the fact that Pope Francis has only one lung debar him from being Pope? Were canon lawyers consulted beforehand?

MAJOR QUESTIONS OF OUR TIME 14 March 2013

Michael, I hope your optimism proves correct. For me Pope Francis' request for people to "pray with him", not just "for him" was a welcomed indication of an inclusive attitude.

Maureen 14 March 2013

Thank you Michael, I felt the stirrings of hope as I read your article.

Patricia Taylor 14 March 2013

Thank God

john frawley 14 March 2013

Nathaniel was overly cynical to ask: can anything good come out of Nazareth/ However, I think I'll risk it and say can anything different - pastoral and responsive - come out of the college of cardinals? We've already been subjected to so much spin about the virtues of the new Pope that I'm not hopeful anything can change.

RobJ 14 March 2013

I thought the whole thing about the Holy Ghost or Holy Spirit was just a joke. But now, I'm not so sure. Ray Cassin, in the other article here, shows how the clever ones had worked it all out and Brigoglio was never mentioned. But somehow these worldly men came up with someone who used to do his own cooking, who was a member of an order whose head was stood down by JP2, an order which educates the elite but included in that number two Castros and one James Joyce, who was conservative on Humanae Vitae but progressive Mater et Magistra. Too many contradictions there even for big data to explain. Or for cynics to be comfortable.

Frank 14 March 2013

Major Question, it's a safe bet not a few of those septuagenarian papal contenders have probably had prostatectomies.

JR 14 March 2013

MAJOR QUESTIONS OF OUR TIME: people usually didn't survive Thoracotomy in Levitus'time. I suggest that that particular Canon Law should go into the dustbin of history.

Bruce S 14 March 2013

Michael, right on!! I believe a reform "way" is to be found in admitting the problem, identifying with it and then working through a process much like the 12 steps program is the way to go. Thanks Michael and greetings from Canada.

Bob Shank 15 March 2013

Francis appears to have been outwardly quiescent during the Junta but apparently helped some of its victims in a personal capacity. Not all clergy can be Dietrich Bonhoeffers or Bayers Naudes. It's easier to speak out in a democracy, such as WW II Britain, where George Bell, Bishop of Chichester, spoke out against the saturation bombing of Germany. It didn't win him any favour. How will Francis go if he needs to stand up to a government when Catholics are discriminated against or persecuted? He seems a gentle, non-combative man in this aspect. Perhaps the Church does need a gentle touch which is sensitive to people's pain at matters like paedophilia. A lot of the Vatican's Medieval and Renaissance pomp and ceremony could be easily dispensed with for the better. Kissing rings etc. only accentuates the power imbalance that enabled bad clergy to overawe their victims. Christ and the original Francis had no time for overweening pomp and ceremony.

Edward F 15 March 2013

There is a difference between the task of fixing "what is broken in the church" and fixing "a broken church". The AA Twelve Steps program has some value when people have to address problems other than alcoholism, which AA regards as a physical, mental and spiritual problem. But AA only works if the person with the drinking problem has the desire to stop drinking. That desire can come about in different ways - loss of a job, a marriage, a limb, liver failure, imprisonment, etc. described in AA literature as a rock bottom. Something obvious happens that makes the alkies see that they are powerless over alcohol; that their lives have become unmanageable. I don;t believe the church is in such a parlous state. It is not broken but parts of it are. If we cannot agree that the church has reached rock bottom as an institution we are unlikely to undertake the radical approach of AA - total abstinence from the offending brew for life. Still I think AA's 4h step "Make a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves' is the way to go. Maybe Pope Francis will promote the Examination of Conscience as a spiritual exercise for the College of Cardinals, and in due course the Synod Bishops. Benedict XVI before resigning examined his conscience and had the courage to follow it. These two great men, Francis and Benedict, could by their actions return Conscience to the centre of catholic spirituality and practice.

Uncle Pat 15 March 2013

Surviving in South American politics for so long suggests man who knows how to survive in the evil empire. We need to look to his record dealing with the power elites in South America to see how likely he is to be in dealing with the same elites in the Vatican Curia. Is he a boat rocker for the poor or a quiet but dismissable voice for the poor? Is he too mild to effect real change? Is a Francis likely to root out evil or will he start a new chapel inside the vast circus tent of Rome. That is what his father Francis did.

graham patison 17 March 2013

...'Francis, go and repair my house which, as you see, is falling into ruin'... He set himself to obeying the command. St. Bonaventure's 'Life of Francis of Assisi' : In that day I will restore David’s fallen shelter— I will repair its broken walls and restore its ruins—and will rebuild it as it used to be, so that they may possess the remnant of Edom and all the nations that bear my name, declares the Lord, who will do these things... Amos 9: 11-15

Game Theory 18 March 2013

The intro to this post says, "The new Pope is a conservative." Presumably it is referring to Pope Francis' position on doctrine, morals, and liberation theology. In which case it is incorrect. The new Pope is not "conservative". Nor is he reactionary, medieval or rigidly pre-Vatican II. He is, simply, Catholic. As one would hope.

HH 18 March 2013

Graham, maybe I'm misinterpreting your comment, but I wouldn't regard South American politics as "the evil empire". I see it more as a result of global imbalance we call the North-South divide (Australia peculiarly falling within the North). I would hazard a guess to say that under similar historic, economic, etc conditions, politics in the North would be just as cut-throat and volatile as the South. That's why I think it's great that Pope Frank is from the South. And despite the harsh realities of South American politics and living, it produces a living faith that is actually about survival, rather than internal doctrinal issues that are irrelevant to most people. (I'm not saying the issue of women priests, married clergy and gay marriage etc are not important, but they are not the concern of the poor.)

AURELIUS 18 March 2013

Keep in mind that archbishops in Latin American dictatorships had to tread very, very carefully. Look what happened to Archbishop Oscar Romero, gunned down while saying Mass! No doubt his assassination was meant not only to shut him up, (he was an outspoken critic of human rights abuses in El Salvador) but also to serve as a warning to other similarly minded prelates in the region. Dom Helder Camara, former Archbishop of Recife, Brazil, had death threats. Interesting, isn't it, that Opus Dei founder Escriva has his statue on the outside of St Peters in Rome, whereas although Oscar Romero's statue is also on a famous church - it is an Anglican church: Westminster Abbey!

Bruce S 18 March 2013

Oscar Romero was also a conservative - liberation theology is the logical application of Catholic social teaching/morality.

AURELIUS 19 March 2013

Eureka Street has obviously given me an incomplete view of the Society of Jesus. I thought they were all slightly to the left of Che Guevara.

Penelope 20 March 2013

Well PENELOPE, as a reader I would hope that Eureka Street is not just a mouthpiece for the Society of Jesus, the same way The Australian isn't for News Ltd/the Murdoch empire. But I think all media are getting squeezed and looking more and more not to bight the hand that feeds them.

AURELIUS 20 March 2013

Quite so, HH.

John 20 March 2013

Pope Francis Pedophile Priest and Clergy...The Pope has sovery little time to resolve the situation..He cant do it without Bishop's Cardinals which most are involved either directly or by movement. He has to take immediate action to fire then all. They have hurt Parishioners and their Children time for all tp go.. It will impact the Church Directly,immediatly but like all things time will mend. No mone panels, comissions, special meetings on the subject'JUST TAKE action.

jACK 24 February 2014

Similar articles

Gillard playing chicken with skilled migrants

7 Comments
Fatima Measham | 20 March 2013

Portesters' banner demands 'Stop the rort of the 457 visa'The Prime Minister's aggressive attempts to tighten the rules for 457 visas is part of a campaign to appease her party's blue-collar base. This didn't begin last month in Western Sydney; it was kick-started as far back as 2011 when she said the 'Australian Greens do not share Australian values'.


Post-Saddam Iraq defined by division

1 Comment
Kerry Murphy | 20 March 2013

George W. Bush gives thumbs-upOne Christian engineer remembers celebrating religious festivals with his Muslim neighbours. They in turn would celebrate Christmas with him. Such interfaith experiences are almost unknown now. Iraqis tell me that at least under Saddam you knew where the boundaries were. Now there is uncertainty and indiscriminate violence.


Why we didn't stop the war

9 Comments
Justin Whelan | 20 March 2013

Iraq War protestIraq was the first war in history to be declared unjust by the people and by almost all Christian leaders in the West before it had started. One poll found that 90 per cent of Australians opposed the war without UN authorisation. Yet under John Howard's leadership we went to war anyway. Where did the anti-war movement go wrong?


Watching as Iraq crumbled

9 Comments
Donna Mulhearn | 20 March 2013

Donna Mulhearn in BaghdadI sat with my Iraqi friend in his photo store. I was his last customer, he said; the bombs would begin tomorrow. And then he began to weep. I remember thinking that his life, and the lives of others like him, would not be given a second's thought once the invasion started. The next day, the bombs began.

 


Australia's ten wasted years of war

14 Comments
Tony Smith | 19 March 2013

Soldiers in IraqGone are the days when Australians believed everyone deserved a fair go: the principle that 'might is right' has replaced the ideals of equity and justice in the national psyche. It is not surprising that after engaging in costly military actions over a decade Australians are more fearful now than when we invaded Iraq in 2003.