A- A A+

Thai turmoil continues

4 Comments
Michael Kelly |  24 August 2015

A government officer pays respect to the portrait of King Bhumibol Adulyadej of Thailand

The chronic political instability in Thailand intensified with the bomb that exploded last week in the middle of a major Bangkok tourist area. With 20 dead and still counting, the event is a decisive rebuttal of the military dictatorship's promise to restore 'happiness' to Thailand.

That's how coup leader and now Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-ocha articulated the aim of the military coup in May 2014 – to make Thais happy again!

Official responses to the bombing, its agents and its principal actor appear increasingly like an episode of the Keystone Cops.

The longer the uncertainty remains, the more farcical the tragedy becomes. Officials contradict each other on basic detail as junta leaders play politics with their local and international allies and adversaries. And still there is no plausible explanation of who, why and with what expected outcome the act of calculated, lethal malice was executed.

The operatives appear to have slipped detection for the time being. Reportedly early intelligence suggested the bomber immediately hopped on a motorcycle taxi and headed to the airport. That was later denied when, after inspection of the photographs of everyone coming in and out of Thailand's international airports, there was no evidence of the phantom figure in a yellow T-shirt.

But what this latest lethal episode says is this: Thailand's political woes will probably only get worse. Why? Because the central issue in Thailand's public life remains unresolved.

The issue? Royal succession. For the appearances of a constitutional monarchy, the rule of law and democratic institutions, Thailand's political and economic culture still revolves around the frail and ageing king and the military.

The wheel-chair bound head of state, the world’s the longest serving royal ruler, is very rarely seen. Yet the reverence he genuinely commands across the vast majority of the Thai population remains intact. But negatively, what drives the ready reverence for the 'father' of the nation is the ambiguity surrounding his son. He will succeed to the throne some time. What the coup was mostly about was the military taking out insurance to make sure they would be in charge when the change came, and that they would be setting the agenda.

The previous government of Yingluck Shinawatra — sister of the ex-Prime Minister Thaksin, deposed in a coup in 2006 — did some economically destructive things that bought it the votes of rice farmers in crucial localities. And they initiated parliamentary procedures to have Thaksin exonerated for his corrupt behaviour as PM that was a red rag to the bull of haters of the Shinawatra clan.

But something else meant Yingluck had to go: the closeness of the Shinawatra clan to parts of the Royal family who were believed to be beyond the generals’ control.

To have that part of the family calling the shots on the demise of the King was just too much for the conservative Bangkok elite that is close to the monarch.

For longer than anyone cares to calculate, Thailand has followed a political cycle that rolls around every six to eight years: election-coup-military rule-new constitution-election-coup again. The cycle goes around and around like a prayer wheel — apparent movement but all spinning on the same spot.

In the not too distant future, that cycle will face a decisive turning point: the death of the king whose blessing has always been needed for a coup. And what happens then, no one knows. But there are some informed hunches.

What the chronic instability reflects is that Thailand is a changing and divided nation. The last 25 years have witnessed consistently robust economic growth that has translated into not only enhanced national and personal wealth and prosperity but higher levels of health care and at least a veneer of education among Thais.

That in turn has led to the creation of a upwardly mobile middle class in rural and regional Thailand that is different to the traditional educated and professional people of Bangkok. This new group is not content to have the Bangkok elite continue to dictate.

The Shinawatra clan rose to power on the rising expectations of changing demographics and the Bangkok elite knows it. That's why the constitution currently being written will seek to ensure that in the future, power is kept in the 'right' hands.

But this is a short sighted and short-term strategy in a the country that is already divided, as the recurrent demonstrations and protests for the last five years show.

In reality, democratic values in Thailand are very weak and the public institutions that support democracy — among them the constitution, the parliament, the courts, rule of law and regulator — lack the independence critical to provide the building blocks for real democracy. And there is still a military that sees itself as serving the monarch, rather than the state, and a police force with an deserved international reputation for corruption and incompetence.

Thailand's instability is set to last at least as long as the nation waits to see how the king's health fares. It may then correct itself with the right political will or it risks becoming an enduring condition of life in Thailand, ushering in a future far more lethal than last week’s episode.


writerMichael Kelly SJ lives in Bangkok where he is CEO of ucanews.com and Publisher of globalpulsemagazine.com.

Thai king homage image by Wikimedia Commons.

 



Comments

Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

As you suggest, Michael, one of the pillars of the current Thai system is,"a police force with an deserved international reputation for corruption and incompetence." From which ex-Prime Minister Thaksin rose. Add in the assistance of Crosby Textor Group advice on how to win an election with all kinds of promises and the end looks like it justifies the means of bgus offerings to ignorant farmers. Then the farmers were cheated of their rice income by Yingluck Shinawatra — sister of Thaksin which threatened the credibility of Thaksin-in exile. Then there is the complication of seeing the King almost as an incarnation of Buddha. You, Michael, know Thailand better than most, but from what I have seen Thai's are great on "wrapping" for small bought items to the administration, so it has to look right. And there are many flavours of democracy and many degrees of readiness for it among nations.

Michael D. Breen 25 August 2015

Thanks for this Michael and thank God for Eureka Street. Nowhere in the mainstream media have I been able to find anything that might help me make any sense of what has happened in Thailand in recent years and this essay goes a long way to unravelling what is often incomprehensible to me. To continue offering this sort of analysis, Eureka Street deserves our full support.

Paul 26 August 2015

Good stuff, Michael - the parallel with Keystone Kops is accurate, and you could extend it to the Army as well, which is only a glorified internal security force anyway. Both organisations are so thoroughly and utterly corrupt that they have little relevance except as a means for Chan-O-Cha to hold power. Without those guns he'd be tossed aside tomorrow.

JimboThai 26 August 2015

"a veneer of education amongst the Thais" - I must take issue with that statement, having been involved in the Thai education system for some years, in the most educationally-backward part of the country - Isaan. Since Thaksin provided free education to Mattayom 3 level (Year 9 here), the overwhelming majority of kids have completed it and then still a majority continuing on to Mattayom 6 (Year 12), with a significant number going further, to one of the many universities in the rural areas.
This is very much more than a veneer, it's a revolution for these country people and adds very significant numbers of literate and numerate people to the country as a whole.

JimboThai 26 August 2015

Similar articles

Be wary of politicians who speak about moral obligation

18 Comments
Justin Glyn | 28 August 2015

One would think after the disastrous interventions in Iraq and Libya that Australians would have learned to be just a little bit suspicious when the US Government suggests another Middle East war, or when a politician urges — as Bob Carr and Tony Blair have — that we have a 'moral obligation' to join the legally dubious US bombing mission in Syria.


The Lord's Resistance Army is alive and well

1 Comment
Dorothy Horsfield | 26 August 2015

LRA soldierFor almost twenty years, across the settlements and subsistence farms of Central Africa the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) has preyed upon civilian populations with exceptional cruelty, emerging from the bush in small units to commit unspeakable atrocities. These days there is a common assumption that the LRA has been decimated and scattered and that its leader Joseph Kony is in hiding and probably ineffectual. But visiting activist Sister Angelique Namaika insists this optimistic assessment is misguided. 


UK Labour's hysterical power struggle

12 Comments
Daniel Read | 18 August 2015

Jeremy CorbynThe ongoing drama over leadership of the UK Labour Party is raising the possibility of further fractures in the politics of austerity, not just in Britain, but across Europe. The entire political edifice of British politics has shifted so far to the right that even a somewhat inoffensive endorsement of state ownership, anti-austerity politics and trade union support, alongside scrapping the UK's nuclear deterrent and questioning our continued membership in NATO, can appear dangerously radical.


The ins and outs of a regional solution for refugees

21 Comments
Samuel Tyrer | 06 August 2015

Asia PacificThe Expert Panel on Asylum Seekers of 2012 said 'a regional cooperation and protection framework' should shape policymaking. Support for a regional solution also exists among academics and NGOs such as the Refugee Council of Australia. So what would such a framework look like? And when the time comes, will Australia be prepared to lead the way by increasing resettlement numbers?


Post-sanctions Iran will be force for stability

2 Comments
Shahram Akbarzadeh | 24 July 2015

Iran flag and nuclear warning symbolIran’s nuclear deal with the UN represents a major breakthrough that could lead to more peace and stability in the region, despite what the critics say. Its policy towards Islamic State is actually much closer to that of the US and the UK than any other country in the region. Convergence of interest against this common enemy could open other doors of dialogue with the West and start a relationship that is no longer hostage to the nuclear issue.