A- A A+

Family violence needs whole community response

1 Comment
Julie Edwards |  29 March 2016


Over the last few years Australians have become much more aware of the extent of family violence and of its effects on victims and perpetrators. The tragic death of Luke Batty and the advocacy of Rosie Batty, his mother, were catalysts for this change.

Woman cowers away from violent manBut the statistics continue to horrify. Seventy-nine women were killed by family violence in Australia last year. This year, barely three months old, the toll already sits at 14.

At the time of Luke Batty's death, Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews declared the whole system broken: 'It doesn't protect the vulnerable, it doesn't punish the guilty and more of the same policies will only mean more of the same tragedies'.

In December 2014 his government announced Australia's first royal commission into family violence. Many community organisations, including Jesuit Social Services, welcomed this.

Today the Royal Commission has released its report. It contains 227 recommendations about how the government can work with the community to make real and lasting changes, all of which the government has already committed to implement.

The work of Jesuit Social Services both with people who have experienced family violence and those who perpetrate it has convinced us that a more integrated and coherent way to prevent violence against women and children and to keep them safe is needed.

This includes sustained investment in safe, secure and affordable housing for women and children escaping violence. To this end, the commission recommends a 'blitz' on rehousing family violence victims stuck in crisis and transitional housing, as well as individualised funding packages to open up access to private rentals for people fleeing violent relationships.

But, important though it is, it is not enough simply to support the victims of family violence. We also need to prevent family violence from occurring. This requires a strategy for preventing family violence that involves the whole community.


"At the heart of preventing violence is changing men's behaviour. The recommendation of the royal commission that 'more work is needed to develop a suite of interventions and programs' for men is welcome."


It is heartening to see this supported in the report, which acknowledges that the government does not currently have 'a system which coordinates and oversees implementation of responses to family violence'.

This whole-of-community approach would include a school curriculum to teach children about respectful relationships. It also must include culturally specific responses for Aboriginal Victorians and other newly arrived communities.

At the heart of preventing violence is changing men's behaviour. The recommendation of the royal commission that 'more work is needed to develop a suite of interventions and programs' for men is welcome.

The implementation of this is vital. Through our work with men of all ages who act violently in intimate relationships and in their families we are very aware of the consequences of the shortage of relevant and effective programs to change men's behaviour.

When participants are ready to work towards change, they often face long waiting lists. In addition, many of the programs that exist are not tailored for specific groups such as young men or men with intellectual disabilities. Critical windows of opportunity are being missed.

The most effective way to keep women and children safe is to change the attitudes and structures in our society that excuse or minimise violence against women, and simultaneously to work directly with individual men at risk of perpetrating further abuse or violence against their partners.

The criminal justice system has a particularly significant role to play in working with men at risk of acting violently in the family. It must adopt proactive and systemic approaches to people who have acted violently towards family members, by both holding offenders to account and working to prevent repeated violence by helping them to address the causes of their violent behaviour.

Only when we get this right can we begin to create safer communities for women and children.

The memory of Luke Batty and the appalling statistics cited at the beginning of this article point to the extent of family violence and the human cost associated with this. They also compel us, the entire community, to address it. The royal commission has proposed some valuable recommendations, and the challenge now is to implement them.


Julie EdwardsJulie Edwards is the CEO of Jesuit Social Services.

The Jesuit Social Services submission to the royal commission can be downloaded here [PDF].

Main image: Shutterstock



Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

So often when reading these stories I think of the old phrase "the paradox of prevention is that nothing happens". Yes, intervention, housing, counseling are all needed to meet immediate needs; but getting to to root cause of the problem rarely seems to enter this discussion. Why does it happen in the first place? How can it be prevented from happening? What interpersonal skills are lacking? How might such skills be taught and at what stage in life ought they be taught? If the problem of domestic and other interpersonal violence is viewed in a wider context maybe different and more effective solutions might be found.

Paddy Byers 11 April 2016

Similar articles

Turnbull's techno-optimism is a tad hasty

Ketan Joshi | 17 February 2016

Happy people wearing promotional hats for new technologiesA government campaign declares 'we've always been good at having ideas. Now we need to get better at innovation: turning ideas into successful products and services.' The message is that we are on the brink of a technological revolution, driven by government. But really we've some way to go. As we have seen with wind turbines, the communities that host new technologies can react with anger and fear. If they are left out of the process, visions of grand, sweeping change can be undermined.

Shedding light on elder abuse

Gillian Bouras | 23 February 2016

Elderly person face half in shadowElder abuse resembles child abuse in its iceberg qualities: both have received little attention until comparatively recently. In the case of elder abuse, very few cases ever come to court: old people are as helpless as children, similarly unable to plead their own cases, and afraid to: they have little power. The Yiddish proverb springs to mind: If you can't bite, don't show your teeth. The most consistent offenders, sad to say, are family members, who are often adept at exploiting the fear that is part of ageing.

#LetThemStay reveals the political capital of compassion

Somayra Ismailjee | 12 February 2016

#LetThemStay rallySince the first churches offered sanctuary to the refugees facing deportation to Nauru, a steady stream of voices have joined the call for compassion. As a political language, compassion is itself a reclamation of power. Extending safety, resources, or even a mere welcome to people in need proves that we have something to give. Strength is embodied by a capacity to aid and assist, rather than in cruelty. Empathy, care and compassion appeal to us on a level of emotion that runs deeper than mere rhetoric.

Gospel brutality reborn in our harrowing of refugee children

Andrew Hamilton | 11 February 2016

#LetThemStay rallyThe High Court decision on detention in Nauru came down just before the Christian season of Lent. It left the government free and determined to deport many young mothers and children to Nauru. For the mothers and children deportation will bring new trauma with renewed threat to their already precarious mental health. For the Australian public it again makes us ask what brutality, even to children, we are ready to tolerate. The savagery of this treatment is a suitable subject for Lenten reflection.

Notes (in Latin) on a football scandal

Brian Matthews | 10 February 2016

Domesday BookEslingadene/Isendene/Essendon was its quiet and bucolic self when Richard Green, one of its respectable citizens, farewelled it in the 1850s, migrated to Australia, settled near Melbourne and, honouring his home village, called the area Essendon. Like its northern hemisphere namesake, Essendon does not appear in the Domesday Book, but Macbeth-like vaulting ambition, disjoined from care and humanity, has enrolled it in a modern Doomsday register and stained its name ineradicably.