A- A A+

Reconciling with president-elect Duterte

5 Comments
Fatima Measham |  12 May 2016

 

Rodrigo Duterte will be inaugurated as the 16th Philippine president next month. It is the culmination of an extraordinarily intense campaign period, but also the beginning of something else. Precisely what is anybody's guess.

DuterteI avoided commenting on the campaign, not least because it left me bewildered. I could not get a grip on Duterte's popularity.

I know and respect many people who support him. These aren't the uneducated, low-income conservatives that Donald Trump has galvanised, though the two men are often compared. I've been known to compare them, too. It's too easy to do.

I was also disturbed. The things Duterte represents — vigilantism, unilateralism and violence — aren't these the same things that Filipino human rights activists had fought against? Is this now the preferred template for imposing order across the country?

What does it even mean for Ferdinand Marcos' son to get this close to being back in Malacañan Palace as vice-president? Does this not defy memory and reason — the ultimate insult against many survivors of torture and incarceration under martial law?

I parsed post after post on social media, trying to working out what I was missing. For months I asked myself, what the hell went wrong?

It is only lately that I'm beginning to accept that I got the wrong end of the question. What went wrong? Everything.

For many, the promise of equity, security and justice that came with a renewed democracy in 1986 remains unfulfilled. The Philippines keeps being touted as a fast-growing Asian economy, but such gains do not trickle down to rural towns and provincial cities.

 

"Visitors and residents are emphatic about Davao being safe and orderly; that its infrastructure and public and emergency services are world-class."

 

Transport infrastructure in urban areas has decayed. Rampant development has come at cost to liveability. Quality healthcare is far from universal. The best-paying jobs are still overseas.

Whether or not it is fair, the perception of gross incompetence at the highest levels hardened after Typhoon Haiyan and the fatal Mamasapano police operation. Certain officials were kept in roles based on tenuous things like presidential favour. Corruption in both houses of Congress and municipal councils routinely led to scandal. Meanwhile, farmers go hungry and indigenous peoples continue to be displaced.

One reading of Duterte's victory is that it came via protest vote, the same anti-establishment movement we see elsewhere but with a distinctly Filipino flavour. There is no doubt that people have had enough of the status quo. But that would only be part of the picture. The rest is opaque, unless one understands what it is like to live in places of criminal impunity.

In the estate where my family lives, a neighbour who was a businessman was kidnapped for ransom. One morning, my mum discovered that the patio gate had been partially jimmied. She locks the door like a tic whenever my (unmistakably Anglo) husband gets in the car. Her brother makes sure someone, any one of his five children, is always at home to dissuade burglars; their schedules revolve around it.

The contrast to Davao, the city Duterte has run with an iron fist for years, is more than stark. Visitors and residents are emphatic about Davao being safe and orderly; that its infrastructure and public and emergency services are world-class. Could anyone really begrudge Filipinos in other cities that?

It goes without saying that transposing Davao to the rest of the Philippines is an untested theory. It is much easier to manage a single fiefdom than several. Human rights advocates, various NGOs and the media are sure to scrutinise Duterte's decisions; he may find national attention harder to bear than parochial adulation. The appetite for change is one thing. Actual change is another.

For now, I have to hope that the hope of so many Filipinos cannot be wrong. I have to hope that the passage of credible elections is a good sign; that hard-won Philippine democratic institutions will not only bear a Duterte presidency but refine it.

 


Fatima MeashamFatima Measham is a Eureka Street consulting editor. She tweets @foomeister and blogs at This is Complicated.

 



Comments

Comments should be short, respectful and on topic. Email is requested for identification purposes only.

Word Count: 0 (please limit to 200)

Submitted comments

I have had an abiding interest in the Philippines since passing through Manila in 1970 on my way elsewhere. I married a Filipina in 1983 and regularly return to the home province, La Union, about 220km north of Manila. I have observed many changes since Marcos was removed from power in the 1980's, not all have been good, crime and corruption continue but compared to the Marcos years, life has improved for some but sadly not all as Fatima observes. Poverty is still painfully evident, particularly in parts of Metro Manila, less so in our Provence. My wife is very concerned by the election outcome and like me, rather puzzled by the outcome. I had a run-in with the Marcos 'goons' in grey suits in 1984 when I was briefly detained at MIA, homeward bound after attending an education conference at a College in San Fernando, La Union. Seems my 'sin' was talking to students! I sincerely hope that the President elect Duterte does not go down the Martial Law path of the Marcos years. We are due to return to the Philippines in November. Then I may get an idea why the people voted him in.

Gavin 13 May 2016

I think that Maslow's theory of the hierarchy of needs might go some way towards answering some of Fatima's questions. The situation in the Philippines reminds me of what a seasoned Catholic missionary said to me regarding his work in India. "There's not much point talking to a Dalit about God's love if he's hungry, uneducated, homeless and ostracised. You've got to do something about those basic needs first. It's the Christian thing to do." It seems to me (at a safe distance) that is what Duterte has been doing in Davao - whatever his motive or his methods. He is meeting some basic social needs of many citizens in the Philippines.

Uncle Pat 13 May 2016

A very truthful and constructive article.I only hope that all will be well. NJK.

Nev.Kelly 13 May 2016

I'm a Good Samaritan Sister living on the island of Negros. I resonate with all Fatima has written and indeed with the comments made. I work in the prisons here on Negros and with the poorest of the poor in squatter areas. I have been astounded that these good folk voted for Dodirty (his nickname!) some from ignorance of what he stands for (some of these same jail residents may find themselves on death row!) but many from desperation - they see the corruption in Goverment over and over - and they continue to struggle to put a meal on their families tables, DESPITE. Having a job! There are so many injustices that abound in this country - the rich are just so rich and unaware of the majority of people who struggle, struggle, struggle. It is unimaginable in a first world country to begin to understand the plight of these beautiful people. PLEASE pray for them all.

Anne Dixon 13 May 2016

Very Good article and very timely now as we watch what happens after the Obama insult and the on-going drug purge. The question remains: how this is this all going to play out in the next 5 years?

Ben Sal 08 September 2016

Similar articles

New Canadian and US laws revive euthanasia debate

30 Comments
Frank Brennan | 17 May 2016

Window in a dark roomOnce the state legislates to permit assistance with the suicide of a dying, suffering, mentally competent person, the door could well be opened to those who agitate a right to kill and not just a liberty to assist with suicide, and that door could be pushed open onto a class of patients which ultimately will include those who are not dying at all That door is now wide open in Belgium and the Netherlands, while he Canadian Parliament is trying to place appropriate limits. I'm for keeping that door firmly shut.


Paying for stopping the boats

9 Comments
Kerry Murphy | 29 April 2016

xxxxxThis week we learnt that the human rights protection for asylum seekers in our former colony Papua New Guinea are more protected by the PNG constitution than they would be in Australia. The PNG government has quickly moved not to change the law and constitution, but to make arrangements to close the centre and ask Australia to take back the asylum seekers. Already PNG lawyers are talking about claims for compensation for the unlawful detention, and rightly so.


Face to face with the dark side of paradise

3 Comments
Catherine Marshall | 29 April 2016

Samoa cyclone skyIt can be a dangerous thing, travelling to paradise. Those turquoise lagoons and white beaches and lush hills often conceal a more sinister side, a Mr Hyde to the brochures' bright-and-shiny Dr Jekyll. So it was on Samoa this week, when Cyclone Amos skirted by. We were told it was headed for Samoa's main island, Upolu, where we were staying. Still, we felt calm, for there wasn't a breath of wind in the sky. Later, at the height of it, I stood up in the dark, opened the curtains and looked outside.


Cheque book solution on asylum is unconstitutional

33 Comments
Frank Brennan | 28 April 2016

Placard reads Close Australian Concentration CampsA bench of five justices of the Supreme Court of Justice, the highest court in Papua New Guinea, has unanimously ruled that the detention of asylum seekers on Manus Island is unconstitutional. Yet again, Australia has been complicit in its Pacific neighbours (PNG and Nauru) prostituting their Constitutions and undermining the rule of law in exchange for a fistful of dollars, with hapless asylum seekers, most of whom are ultimately proved to be refugees, being left to languish.


Francis in Lesbos confronts the unforgivable sin

10 Comments
Gillian Bouras | 19 April 2016

The Power and the Glory by Graham GreenPope Francis recently visited the island of Lesbos, another scene of immigrants' dire suffering, and surprised the world by taking 12 refugees back to Rome with him. Bernie Sanders asserted that the Pope, in his gesture of hope, is surely the greatest demonstration against a surrender to despair. I am still partly persuaded by Graham Greene's view of despair as being the unforgivable sin, but I'm also giving some thought to the distressing matter of indifference.