Best of 2010: Gillard's win a loss for feminists


Julia Gillard

First published in Eureka Street on 25 June 2010.

Feminists the length and breadth of Australia are celebrating the ascension of Julia Gillard to the country's highest state of office. The extraordinary recent events in the nation's capital have produced a result that constitutes 'the realisation of a feminist dream', says Caroline Overington, a columnist at The Australian.

'Plenty of women, married and single, with and without children, working or at home, sat in front of TV sets [on Thursday] morning, and watched this unfold with our daughters on our laps. We texted each other, saying: "Woo-Hoo!" and "Yee-ha!"' she writes.

The online feminist forum The Dawn Chorus said that, while it would be nice for Australia's first female PM to have been voted in by the public rather than a secretive party ballot, it is nonetheless 'thrilled and moved that our first female PM will be sworn in by our first female Governor General, no matter how it happened'.

And the new prime minister's biographer, Christine Wallace, said on Radio National that Gillard's willingness to unsheathe the sword and wrench the job into her own hands is a really positive development.

Indeed, there is an undeniably pleasant frisson that runs through the blood when one considers that Australia has finally caught up with countries like Pakistan, India, Chile, Liberia, New Zealand, Ireland and, of course, Britain, where Margaret Thatcher was elected to the top job more than 30 years ago.

But does Gillard's succession represent a win for all Australian women, or are feminists hijacking a tired and outdated bandwagon in an era when women are already well-represented in politics? Would feminists be as congratulatory if Kevin Rudd's public humiliation was caused by another man? If he was throttled at the polls by Tony Abbott?

In claiming the ousting of Kevin Rudd as a win for their cause, feminists have evinced an unfortunate kneejerk reaction, nailing their colours to a mast which smacks not of liberation and transparency — values beloved of feminists — but rather of intense faction fighting, union-led pressure and a whole lot of secrecy.

For those who had gone to bed early on Wednesday night, the news early on Thursday morning of Gillard's prime ministerial challenge would have come as a shock, not least when they reflected on her apparent loyalty and sincere assertion in the preceding months that she would not be seeking the top job in the near future.

The flippantly joyous response implies that all feminists — indeed, all women — should blindly support the incumbent, not because they agree with her political ideologies or believe she brings valuable skills to the job, but because she is a woman.

It's an attitude that is as mired in the past as the very notion that women can't lead their countries. It singles women out as a group deserving of special rather than equal treatment; to whom the rules don't apply because they haven't yet been given the chance to play the game.

And, perhaps most damningly, it fails to acknowledge the gains that Rudd's government brought about for women everywhere: the introduction of a paid parental leave scheme, the implementation of National Employment Standards which provide for flexible working arrangements for the parents of young children, the appointment of strong women to key positions.

Those same daughters who sat in their mothers' laps on Thursday morning as they texted 'whoo-hoo' and 'yee-haa' to their friends will in all likelihood still be the beneficiaries of Rudd's policies and actions way down the track, not least his swift arrest of the effect on Australia of the global economic meltdown. The daughters of Indigenous people will grow up with the word 'sorry' ringing in their ears, and little girls from war-torn countries will be grateful for the relatively compassionate treatment they received under Rudd's asylum policies.

If feminism is the incidental beneficiary of Kevin Rudd's downfall, then it is a hollow one indeed, besmirched by the ugly cut-and-thrust of politics and made all the more disheartening by the gaps that still remain. 'It would be wonderful if we didn't need to draw attention to the fact that Julia Gillard is a woman', said Dr Lauren Rosewarne, an expert in feminist politics at the University of Melbourne. 'The fact that we have to talk about her being the first female PM reminds us how far we have left to come.'

Rather than adding gloss to the cause of women, the sorry saga of Kevin Rudd's eviction should strike fear into the hearts of feminists everywhere. For this is how the Labor Government operates, unsheathing the swords, wrenching power, cutting down a leader before he has had time to really prove himself. Imagine what it will do when that leader is a woman.

More on the leadership takeover:
It's a girl!
Goodbye Kevin, hello Julia
Moving forward with Gillard
Remembering Rudd

Catherine MarshallCatherine Marshall is a journalist working for Jesuit Communications. 

Topic tags: Catherine Marshall, Julia Gillard, feminists, caroline overington



submit a comment

Existing comments

The selection (not election) of Julia Gillard to become the Prime Minister had nothing to do feminism at all. The selection of Gillard demonstrated a very dangerous path for our democracy. We see the existence of a very pragmatic and powerful new “ruling class”. Most political parties have agreed broadly on policies of a semi-liberal capitalistic society with broad based social safety nets. We see now a number of people reaching highest office without ever having “lived” like most people. An ever-increasing number of people “representing “ us have never had a “real life”. I mean they never worked outside unions or political lobby groups. They do not understand the aspirations of ordinary people but rely on opinion polls to formulate a public image. During the Middle Ages we had knights and lords “representing” the people. Today we have “professional politicians” and public servants “representing” the people. During the Middle Ages we had knights fighting in skirmishes in front of peasants for power. Today we have opponents fighting “elections” as media entertainment. Julia Gillard’s “winning” the job as a Prime Minister had little to do with democracy, Labor politics, the will of the people or democracy but demonstrated the power of the new ruling class.

Beat Odermatt | 10 January 2011  

Kevin Rudd fluffed his lines. So he was sent backstage and someone else (in this case a woman) was given the lead role. He re-appeared on stage in a less demanding role.

Joyce | 10 January 2011  

Well said , Beat Odermatt. Unions are a pathway for aspiring labour politicians, limiting representation by those who have lived in the real world.

JUne | 14 January 2011  

Similar Articles

Best of 2010: Other unsung Indigenous heroes

  • Myrna Tonkinson
  • 14 January 2011

Not yet 40, she must live in Perth, hundreds of kilometres from home, to receive dialysis. She is currently in hospital recovering from spinal surgery, and so is separated even from her city-based loved ones. Yet she appears always with a beaming smile.


Best of 2010: Tony Abbott's missing moral core

  • Neil Ormerod
  • 11 January 2011

Tony Abbott has been in public life for a long time. Most recently there has been his meteoric rise to leadership of the Liberal party and to a hair’s breadth from the prime ministership itself. Charming and disarming as he can be, there is something deeply disturbing in the way he carries out his public role.



Subscribe for more stories like this.

Free sign-up