Welcome to Eureka Street

back to site

Let's redistribute hope

'Redistributing Hope' by Chris JohnstonThe way I looked at the world changed forever when I first read Frantz Fanon, the psychiatrist and great theorist of the confluence between the colonisation of land and the crushing of the spirit. Colonial Algeria, a site of incredible violence, seems like a world away from industrialised Australia in the 21st century. But it is not.

Not when we are living with laws that have been forced upon sections of our population on the basis of race and 'for their own good'. The Federal Government's shameful attempt to extend compulsory income management in an effort to get around the Racial Discrimination Act is nothing more than a cynical manoeuvre, a deliberate commitment to the American path of close supervision of people who are doing it tough.

This is insulting to the people we stand in solidarity with. This paltry effort to conceal racial discrimination leads the government into the equally dangerous waters of class discrimination.

Colonial Algeria is not a world away when the First Nations of Australia continue to live with the toxic fruits of historical colonisation and the perpetuation of the structures of internal colonisation.

It is not a world away when, in the language of the beatitudes — which, as Oscar Romero pointed out before his own violent death, have turned everything upside down — the people who hunger for justice here and now are really joined at the hip with those who hungered for justice there and then. When here and now we can make our own that poignant prayer on Fanon's lips: 'Oh my body, make of me a human who always questions!'

Good policy needs not only to arise from critical questions; it should itself provide a relentless critique of reality.

When, for example, we embarked in Australia on a road of universal free health care we were posing a question to the existing reality. The policy itself cried out: 'Who has been missing out? Why is healthcare not best left to the mechanisms of the marketplace? Why are people going to prison for failure to pay their medical debts?'

And yet, today we are burdened with a burgeoning system of private health insurance which is not only inefficient, as pointed out by such analysts as Ian McCauley, but is grossly expensive and unfair.

Recent proposals by the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission, which more deeply embed the role of private health insurance will, as John Menadue says, lay the ground 'for the eventual demise of Medicare'. Menadue argues: 'The end result would be a two-tiered health service: a public tier for the poor and a private tier for the wealthy. Equity would go. Efficiency would go. And social solidarity would be a thing of the past.'

Good policy, of course, sees a diversity of issues as being whole cloth, as being interconnected.

Oh, and about Algeria, Professor Larissa Behrendt has noted this following alarming comparison:

'The data indicates anaemia rates in children under the age of five in the Sunrise Health Service region have jumped significantly since the Intervention. From a low in the six months to December 2006 of 20 per cent — an unacceptably high level, but one which had been reducing from levels of 33 per cent in October 2003 — the figure had gone up to 36 per cent by December 2007.

'By June 2008 this level had reached 55 per cent, a level that was maintained in the six months to December 2008. In two years, 18 months of which has been under the Intervention, the anaemia rate has nearly trebled ... It is nearly double the level it was before the Sunrise Health Service was established, and more than twice the rate measured across the rest of the Northern Territory.

'According to the World Health Organisation, levels of anaemia above 40 per cent represent a severe public health problem. At 55 per cent, the Sunrise Health Service results can be equated to early childhood anaemia levels in Brazil, Burundi, Iraq and Zambia; and are worse than Zimbabwe, Swaziland, Pakistan, Peru, Jamaica, Indonesia, Bangladesh and Algeria.'

With the exception of a couple of fanatical poverty-deniers who are taken seriously by nobody there is a broad consensus in Australian social science that we do have a serious problem with poverty and disadvantage, that this problem affects the lives of at least 11 per cent of the population, that the causes of poverty are primarily structural rather than behavioural, and that we can, as a society, address these causes.

Frantz Fanon reminded us nearly 50 years ago:

'What counts today, the question which is looming on the horizon, is the need for a redistribution of wealth. Humanity must reply to this question, or be shaken to pieces by it.'

We have been shaken to pieces by this question.

If wealth is correctly understood here as access to appropriate housing, health, education, transport, childcare, employment, social security and wholeness I would simply add that, in order to achieve this, there must be a massive redistribution of hope along with the redistribution of wealth.

I will never forget the first time I read the poem by Tomás Borge, a former Minister of Justice in the Nicaraguan Government. His wife had been raped and murdered before his eyes by the military regime he had fought against. In Christianity and Revolution he tells us:

'After having been brutally tortured as a prisoner, after having a hood placed over my head for nine months, after having been handcuffed for seven months, I remember that when we captured these torturers I told them: "The hour of my revenge has come: we will not do you even the slightest harm. You did not believe us beforehand; now you will believe us." That is our philosophy, our way of being.'

He then produced what I think are some of the most memorable lines of poetry in human history. A poem called 'Mi Venganza' personal ('My personal revenge'), addressed to his torturers. He wrote:

'I will be revenged upon your children when they've the right to schooling and to flowers ...
On that day I'll greet you with "Good morning!" and the streets will have no beggars left to haunt us ...
I will be revenged upon you, brother, when I give you these hands, which once you tore and tortured, without the strength to rob them of their tenderness'

A redistribution of hope is not happening quickly enough as we begin the 21st century. We are, however, witnessing the emergence of a new reality in which people are beginning to be united in their experience of exclusion along with those who stand in solidarity with them. In the prophetic words of the Nobel Prize-winning poet and advocate, Pablo Neruda:

'We will win.
Although you don't believe it,
we will win.'

John FalzonDr John Falzon is Chief Executive Officer of the St Vincent de Paul Society National Council and a member of the Australian Social Inclusion Board.

Topic tags: john falzon, vinnies, st vincent de paul, redistribution of hope, frantz fanon, Tomas Borge, Mi Venganza



submit a comment

Existing comments

Thank you,John for a wonderful article. You bring home to us, the psychological, legal and material torture inflicted upon native Australians by this policy of racial exclusion from entitlements not denied to anyone else in comparable circumstances in Australia. One can only hope that there is a redistribution of hope, health and wealth, not only in Australia, but among all nations.The obscenity of the billionaires made wealthy on the backs of sweated labour and the ignorance of the majority in western society who buy their output demand it.

Graham Holmes | 11 December 2009  

Thanks John for a good article. I also agree with Graham Holme's comments. Unfortunately, this article will not appear in the any of the mainstream newspapers, which is why most Australian people are ignorant about income and wealth distribution. I have heard of Frantz Fanon, but cannot recall having read any of his writings. I am more familiar with the writings of the Sydney Uni. political economist, Ted Wheelwright, in the 1960's and 1970's and these also did not get much coverage in the mainstream media.

I believe that the most important issue for people living in poverty is the lack of education.

Mark Doyle | 11 December 2009  

"What counts today, the question which is looming on the horizon, is the need for a redistribution of wealth."

With due respect, I totally disagree.

Some are poor because they have had the wealth they created stolen from them by private individuals. The vast majority of the world's poor are so because they are prevented from creating their own wealth by oppressive state taxes and regulations. The spectacular but unsung example of Hong Kong since the 1950's shows how, in a climate of economic freedom and the rule of law, people of all abilities routinely rise from poverty to wealth. The example of Zimbabwe demonstrates, in a tragic mirror image, the same truth.

The first Australians are not another species. They, like all other human beings, are (among other things) natural wealth creators. In a regime of private property, economic freedom and the rule of law, they will flourish. Many - perhaps the majority - are without ceremony creating their own wealth alongside their neighbours in urban Australia. What is happening in the remote communities is the predictable result of the socialist fantasies of '60s social planners inflicting schemes based on errors just like that articulated by Mr Fanon, above.

Hugh | 12 December 2009  

Sorry Dr John Falzon; in your eagerness you confuse. You overlook the fact that the elected government is responsible and accountable for every Tax dollar spent for what ever reason. There are people that cannot manage financially for a wide range of problems. You have overlooked the meaning of responsibility both by the giver and the receiver. The purpose of all benefits is to assist and the government is responsible in ensuring those benefits are used accordingly or abuse develops.

Edward J | 14 December 2009  

Tomas Borge’s revenge requires a revolution of the heart … of the human psyche … for EVERYONE of us.

How can we all be as great as him?
If this is the only way we can help our suffering brothers, what hope is there?

MARK MEEHAN | 14 December 2009  

John - you leave yourself open to misinterpretation with such bald statements as "what is needed is a redistribution of wealth". It sounds like all you want is for society, through the agency of government, to provide the poor with "a hand-out, not a hand-up", a reversal of Vinnies well-known motto. What a more explicitly nuanced version of this assertion would say (to paraphrase Nobel prize-winning economist, Amartya Sen) is something like: "what we need is for the poor to be assisted to develop the capabilities, and to be offered the freedom and opportunity, to work in partnership with other to generate their own wealth". That formulation would provide ample scope for a member of the Social Inclusion Board to offer policy prescriptions that might have some chance of being taken seriously by decision-makers.

David de Carvalho | 16 December 2009  

John De Carvalho - where exactly does John Falzon make the 'bald statement', 'what is needed is a redistribution of wealth'? He cites the Frantz Fanon quote that refers to 'the need for a redistribution of wealth', but uses this as a launching pad for his own reflections on what is really needed, i.e. 'a redistribution of hope'. I think you do not give John Falzon enough credit when you imply that his argument is not nuanced.

Charles Boy | 17 December 2009  

Similar Articles

Holiday greetings from Eureka Street

  • Staff
  • 18 December 2009

A big thank you to all our readers for your support during 2010. Eureka Street will begin publishing its Best Articles of 2009 on 4 January. Our regular publishing schedule will recommence on 18 January. We hope you have a fulfilling and relaxing holiday season. See you next year!


Chaotic endgame in Copenhagen

  • Tony Kevin
  • 18 December 2009

At conferences like this, an atmosphere of crisis is necessary for final deals to be achieved. Kevin Rudd will not want to define the summit as a failure so, hopefully, his notorious 5 per cent emissions reduction target will be left behind.