Welcome to Eureka Street

back to site

Robodebt and the human cost

2 Comments

 

Since August 2022 the Royal Commission into the Robodebt Scheme has been gathering evidence about one of the greatest public policy and administrative failures of recent times. Systemic failures of governance, leadership and common sense has featured heavily in evidence before the Commission. The Scheme’s existence relied upon the then Government’s indifference towards those on welfare and a social security system which is no longer fit for purpose.

Over the past two decades there have been some fifteen Royal Commissions established by the Australian government. Notable amongst these are the inquiries into the misconduct of the banking industry, aged care quality and safety; and the institutional responses to child sex abuse. Royal Commissions are regarded as the highest form of inquiry on matters of public importance. The investigative powers of the Commission are extensive, though the implementation of recommendations by governments can be less than fulsome.

The Robodebt Scheme was an initiative of the Coalition government in 2015. Its primary purpose was to automate the process of identifying and recovering debts to the Commonwealth from people who were in receipt of welfare support. This budget measure anticipated billions of dollars in savings to the Government’s budget bottom line. Instead, following a successful class action, the then Morrison government was forced to settle the claim against it, wiping the debts of some 381,000 people and costing taxpayers a staggering $1.8 billion.

Not only had the scheme failed to deliver on the billions of dollars of budget savings, it was labelled by Justice Bernard Murphy, the presiding Federal Court justice, as a massive failure and a shameful chapter in public administration.

The evidence before Commissioner Catherine Holmes AC SC, has been both illuminating and damning. Ably supported by Counsel Assisting, there has been a forensic exploration of the Scheme, with witnesses from the departments of Social Services (DSS) and Human Services (DHS) visibly uncomfortable with any line of questioning touching on the lawfulness of the Scheme. Such was the concern that there appeared to be reticence in appealing decisions adverse to the department, where the lawfulness of the debt calculation was raised. In the eyes of many this was a deliberate strategy to protect the Scheme from legal scrutiny as to its lawfulness.

Rather than acknowledging and addressing the legal issues concerning the Scheme, the Commission heard that the Government would instead mount a media campaign in the defence of it.

 

'Despite the many failings of the Scheme, it is difficult not to turn one’s mind to the question of whether those failings, in part, reflect a welfare system whose architecture and foundations are out of date.'

 

Rachel Miller, the former media adviser to Alan Tudge, the then Minister for Human Services, told the Commission that she developed and implemented a media strategy designed to arrest control of the public narrative about the Scheme. The Commission heard that central to this strategy was the provision of stories and personal details of welfare recipients to sympathetic media outlets as a way to refute concerns about Robodebt and more cynically call into question the integrity of the complainants. Asked whether the strategy was successful, Miller said yes.

The Government’s strategy to undermine legitimate criticism of the scheme was something out of House of Cards. It showed a level of desperation to protect a flawed system and more concerning how far it would go to silence dissent.

This Inquiry is doing more than simply uncovering who knew what and when about the Robodebt Scheme. It has provided a platform for people to tell their stories about the Scheme’s impact on their health and financial wellbeing. It is the much-needed opportunity to shine a light on the human cost of Robodebt.

With at least another block of hearings to be conducted, no doubt more revelations will be made before the Commission settles into the task of preparing its final report. There are already some clear signals emerging about issues and recommendations which are likely to be canvassed in the final report, including ensuring the legality of a scheme before its implemented.

The former ministers and public officials responsible for the Robodebt Scheme will no doubt await the final report with some trepidation.

Despite the many failings of the Scheme, it is difficult not to turn one’s mind to the question of whether those failings, in part, reflect a welfare system whose architecture and foundations are out of date. The Albanese Government would be well advised to use the Royal Commission’s findings to trigger a root and branch review of our social security system to ensure that it is fit for purpose for a modern Australia and protect Australians from ever having to encounter a public policy failure such as Robodebt again.

 

 

 


 

Joe Zabar is the Chair of Mercy Works Ltd and an Advisor on Strategy and Policy.

Main image: Robodebt Royal Commissioner Ms Catherine Holmes AC SC. 

Topic tags: Joe Zabar, AusPol, Robodebt, Policy, Welfare, Royal Commission

 

 

submit a comment

Existing comments

Kudos to you Joe for highlighting exactly what The Albanese Government needs to do following the Royal Commission. The Royal Commission into the Robodebt Scheme has only just scraped the surface of a much deeper problem. You only have to try and make contact, or visit a service centre and observe the situation first hand to see the system is broken beyond repair. Not sure if any government has the capacity, or will to change the culture and internal systems, to make the operation fit for purpose. If only governments were bound by the inquiries’ recommendations then maybe, just maybe, our most vulnerable and marginalised people would be the central focus of policymakers, and those working on the frontline.


Anna | 17 February 2023  

Thankyou Joe for this important article about the Robo-debt Royal Commission.

Many decent Australians who value the Australian concept of “caring for the underdog” are appalled at what the Royal Commission is revealing and would agree with Justice Bernard Murphy - the presiding Federal Court justice – when he described this illegal and cruel process as a massive failure and a shameful chapter in public administration.

According to ACOSS CEO Dr Cassandra Goldie who goes further: "Robo-debt has unleashed thousands of debt notices in error to parents, people with disabilities, carers, students and people seeking paid work, resulting in people slapped with Centrelink debts they do not owe or debts higher than they owe,"
....."It has been a devastating abuse of government power that has caused extensive harm, particularly among people who are the most vulnerable in our community."

The whole process has put many battling Australians under enormous stress and tragically a number have taken their lives as a result.

Over 2000 people died after receiving Centrelink robo-debt notice, figures reveal - triple j (abc.net.au)

The same politicians who persisted in continuing this grossly unfair scheme when they were told it was illegal have also been involved in other extreme bullying and vindictive actions against asylum seekers, whistle blowers and tried to to steal the Timor Sea resources from the people of Timor-Leste after they had suffered 24 years of Indonesian fascist terrorism.

And throughout this time, many of the key players have preached to all and sundry in sanctimonious tones how they believe in the rule of law! It has to be said that the hypocrisy of the conservative political perpetrators is sickening.

A key question now is what compensation is going to be given to the victims and the families of those who suicided because of the Robo-debt fiasco?

Another question we have to ask is why some politicians and the key public servants who support them feel that it is acceptable to be so vindictive and hard-hearted towards those who are experiencing the hardships brought on by the pandemic and the harsh economic climate that we are currently experiencing?

The 2022 federal election saw the LNP suffer a great loss of support. Surely, this should lead to a reappraisal of the type of people who should be candidates for political office. The overriding function of political leaders is to ensure that the most vulnerable are adequately cared for.

The giving of billions of tax dollars to the wealthiest citizens an largest corporation – many who pay little or no tax – while cutting back services and unfairly targeting them is not the way to go. And the ALP needs to take notice of this fact as well as the LNP.

Thankyou Joe for this important article about the Robo-debt Royal Commission.

Many decent Australians who value the Australian concept of “caring for the underdog” are appalled at what the Royal Commission is revealing and would agree with Justice Bernard Murphy - the presiding Federal Court justice – when he described this illegal and cruel process as a massive failure and a shameful chapter in public administration.

According to ACOSS CEO Dr Cassandra Goldie who goes further: "Robo-debt has unleashed thousands of debt notices in error to parents, people with disabilities, carers, students and people seeking paid work, resulting in people slapped with Centrelink debts they do not owe or debts higher than they owe,"
....."It has been a devastating abuse of government power that has caused extensive harm, particularly among people who are the most vulnerable in our community."

The whole process has put many battling Australians under enormous stress and tragically a number have taken their lives as a result.
Over 2000 people died after receiving Centrelink robo-debt notice, figures reveal - triple j (abc.net.au)

The same politicians who persisted in continuing this grossly unfair scheme when they were told it was illegal have also been involved in other extreme bullying and vindictive actions against asylum seekers, whistle blowers and tried to illegally use dubious practices to steal the Timor Sea resources from the people of Timor-Leste after they had suffered 24 years of Indonesian fascist terrorism.

And throughout this time, many of the key players have preached to all and sundry in sanctimonious tones how they believe in the rule of law! It has to be said that the hypocrisy of the conservative political perpetrators is sickening.

A key question now is what compensation is going to be given to the victims and the families of those who suicided because of the Robo-debt fiasco?

Another question we have to ask is why some politicians and the key public servants who support them feel that it is acceptable to be so vindictive and hard-hearted towards those who are experiencing the hardships brought on by the pandemic and the harsh economic climate that we are currently experiencing?

The 2022 federal election saw the LNP suffer a great loss of support. Surely, this should lead to a reappraisal of the type of people who should be candidates for political office. The overriding function of political leaders is to ensure that the most vulnerable are adequately cared for.

The giving of billions of tax dollars to the wealthiest citizens an largest corporation – many who pay little or no tax – while cutting back services and unfairly targeting them is not the way to go. And the ALP needs to take notice of this fact as well as the LNP.








Andrew (Andy) Alcock | 03 March 2023  

Similar Articles

Farewell the unlamented TPVs

  • Andrew Hamilton
  • 16 February 2023

After years of intense debate, Australia has now offered permanent residence to people with Temporary Protection Visas (TPVs), which caused great suffering and were part of a deterrence policy. However, this decision is just an incremental step towards a more humane refugee program that respects secure borders and the humanity of people seeking protection.

READ MORE

Australia ends decades-long uncertainty for thousands of refugees

  • Kerry Murphy
  • 16 February 2023

A Valentine’s Day present from the Minister for Immigration for those on temporary protection visas is a much-anticipated relief for approximately 19,000 refugees in Australia. And while a solution is welcome for these refugees, there remains around a further 10,000 whose status and future is uncertain.

READ MORE
Join the conversation. Sign up for our free weekly newsletter  Subscribe