In his press conference calling an election Scott Morrison declared: 'If you vote for me, you get me, if you vote for Bill Shorten, you get Bill Shorten.' This seems a rather obvious observation (putting aside the fact that in Australia voters elect their local MP not the prime minister) until you remember this could be the first government in over a decade in which we see a full term prime minister.
In the words of Tony Abbott discovering street libraries for the first time, there are Australians who have 'never seen anything like this before'.
Young voters and migrants who have become citizens since 2007 have little experience of 'stable government'. The feverish speculation that launches on social media whenever there is a whiff of leadership tensions birthed the question 'Is it on?' The obsession with 'on-erism' even sparked a joke that leadership spills are the main national sport, albeit a blood sport.
If Shorten is victorious on 18 May it would require three quarters of the caucus to knife him under the Rudd rule. Similarly, a win for Morrison could only see him removed by a two thirds majority. Only time will tell if these protections are enough to stop a challenge.
On the bigger picture of uncertainty, the election has been a sort of long anxiety spiral. It is hard to know if the spiral began when Morrison visited the Governor-General, or when Gillard deposed Rudd, or when the media began to accelerate into a disrupted, saturated 24/7 news cycle, or when politicians turned their work into a permanent campaign. In any case, it is exhausting.
The public is not waiting with bated breath for the result on election night — the level of interest is too low. And while they are dissatisfied, they don't seem to be waiting with baseball bats the way they did with the November Victorian state election. They seem to just be waiting.
Waiting to know if 'this lot will be voted out'. Waiting to know if Shorten 'will steal their utes'. Waiting to know if Australia will act on climate change. Waiting to know if their franking credits will be safe. Waiting to know if their wages will rise. Waiting to know what their tax cut will be. Waiting to know about Engadine Maccas. Waiting to know if they will be protected against vegan terrorists. Waiting to know if Newstart will get an increase after 25 years.
"The stakes are high with this election, and the choices are clear. For some, the result could determine whether they will have kids or not."
The whole process of federal elections is uncertainty manifest. Australia has no fixed terms on federal elections, leaving the date of 'the only poll that counts' in the hands of the incumbent prime minister.
In the months leading up to the call, government departments often go into pre-caretaker mode, the equivalent of a yellow traffic light. This slows down their work, from research to consultation to decisions, and that is even before entering caretaker mode — which lasts from when parliament is prorogued until a result is declared. This time, as we know, can be up to two months.
There is an added sense of foreboding for public servants, who are the canary in the coal mine for change. Following an election the trend has been for the elected party to shake up and sack secretaries and slice out jobs that clash with their vision. Take for example Abbott's scrapping of the climate change department or John Howard's night of the long knives.
The stakes are high with this election, and the choices are clear. For some, the result could determine whether they will have kids or not. A recent survey by the Australian Conservation Foundation with 1 Million Women found one in three women under 30 are reconsidering having children because of fears of climate change. There are young people telling their parents they have a choice between voting for the Coalition, and getting grandkids.
On the other hand, there are parents telling their kids that the benefits from their investment portfolio — whether in shares or property — will drop if Labor seizes power.
Voting in Australia is compulsory. Like paying taxes, it is a regular requirement of citizenship, and not doing so is a fineable offence. Increasingly it is perceived as a chore. Arguments for making it voluntary are weak. So like any chore there are those who want to 'eat the frog' by pre-polling, and those who will put it off until they have to do it. Some who voted early say they just wanted to get it over with: 'Wake me up on 19 May.'
Eliza Berlage is a Canberra based journalist and podcast producer with a background in sociology. She currently works in the Parliament House press gallery as a researcher for The Conversation's chief political correspondent Michelle Grattan.